{"id":599,"date":"2020-05-01T17:31:56","date_gmt":"2020-05-01T21:31:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=599"},"modified":"2025-06-04T16:59:16","modified_gmt":"2025-06-04T20:59:16","slug":"599","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/chapter\/599\/","title":{"raw":"6.5 Internal Rate of Return","rendered":"6.5 Internal Rate of Return"},"content":{"raw":"When NPV is positive we know that the project being examined earns more than the required rate. When NPV is negative we know that the project being examined earns less than the required rate.\r\n\r\nOnly when NPV is zero does the project actually earn exactly the required rate. In this special case we can view the inflows as paying back our investment plus interest at the required rate. The <em>internal rate of return <\/em>(IRR) is the rate at which this happens, i.e., the rate for which:\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">[latex]\\begin{align*}\r\n\\text{PV Inflows}&amp;= \\text{PV Outflows}\\\\\r\nNPV &amp;= 0\\\\\r\n\\end{align*}[\/latex]<\/p>\r\nConsider the manufacturing company in Example 6.3.1. In that case at a 20% effective rate of return the present value of inflows was\r\n\r\n$208,333.33 and the present value of outflows was $233,333.33 so that:\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">[latex]NPV =$208,333.33 -$233,333.33= -$25,000.00[\/latex]<\/p>\r\nWe also found in Learning Activity #2 that the NPV at 15% was $13,641.07.\r\n\r\nIf the required rate is changed to 10% effective,\u00a0 the present value of inflows becomes $299,315.12 and the present value of outflows becomes $236,363.64 so that:\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">[latex]NPV=$299,315.12 - $236,363.64 = $62,951.48[\/latex]<\/p>\r\nSimilarly we can establish the following values:\r\n<div align=\"center\">\r\n<table class=\"aligncenter\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>Required Rate<\/td>\r\n<td>16%<\/td>\r\n<td>17%<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>NPV<\/td>\r\n<td>$5,156.73<\/td>\r\n<td>-$2,927.98<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nIt should be clear that the rate which would make NPV = 0 is between 16% and 17% effective. From the graph below we can see that this value, the <strong>internal rate of return <\/strong>of this project, is about 16.6%.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_4128\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"300\"]<img class=\"size-medium wp-image-4128\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/971\/2020\/05\/IRRvsNPV-300x146.png\" alt=\"This graph shows the NPV on the y-axis, and the MARR on the x-axis\" width=\"300\" height=\"146\" \/> NPV at different MARR values.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThe internal rate of return can be obtained from business calculators. In the case of the BAII Plus, place the cash flows in the calculator as for the NPV, remembering to clear all ([2ND][CF][2ND][CE|C]) before entering:\r\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\" border=\"0\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>CF0 = -200,000<\/td>\r\n<td><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>C01 = -40,000<\/td>\r\n<td>F01 = 1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>C02 = 50,000<\/td>\r\n<td>F02 = 3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td>C03 = 300,000<\/td>\r\n<td>F03 = 1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\nand then pressing [IRR][CPT]\r\n\r\nYou should see the answer, IRR= 16.63227%\r\n\r\nNote that this is a solution to the equation:\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">[latex]\\begin{align*}\r\n\\text{PV Inflows} &amp;= \\text{PV Outflows}\\\\\r\n\\frac{$50,000}{(1+i)^2}+\\frac{$50,000}{(1+i)^3}+\\frac{$50,000}{(1+i)^4} +\\frac{$300,000}{(1+i)^5} &amp;= $200,000 +\\frac{$400,000}{(1+i)^1}\r\n\\end{align*}[\/latex]<\/p>\r\nWhich is quite difficult to solve by hand.\r\n\r\nThe answer in your calculator will always be a <strong>periodic rate <\/strong>for whatever period was used for the flows. Since the cash flows were yearly, the rate is an effective rate in this case.\u00a0 Since we are working with estimates, it is not uncommon to work exclusively with annual rates, as we do in this textbook.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<h2>Your Own Notes<\/h2>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Are there any notes you want to take from this section? Is there anything you'd like to copy and paste below?<\/li>\r\n \t<li>These notes are for you only (they will not be stored anywhere)<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Make sure to download them at the end to use as a reference<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n[h5p id=\"1\"]\r\n\r\n&nbsp;","rendered":"<p>When NPV is positive we know that the project being examined earns more than the required rate. When NPV is negative we know that the project being examined earns less than the required rate.<\/p>\n<p>Only when NPV is zero does the project actually earn exactly the required rate. In this special case we can view the inflows as paying back our investment plus interest at the required rate. The <em>internal rate of return <\/em>(IRR) is the rate at which this happens, i.e., the rate for which:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">[latex]\\begin{align*}  \\text{PV Inflows}&= \\text{PV Outflows}\\\\  NPV &= 0\\\\  \\end{align*}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>Consider the manufacturing company in Example 6.3.1. In that case at a 20% effective rate of return the present value of inflows was<\/p>\n<p>$208,333.33 and the present value of outflows was $233,333.33 so that:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">[latex]NPV =$208,333.33 -$233,333.33= -$25,000.00[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>We also found in Learning Activity #2 that the NPV at 15% was $13,641.07.<\/p>\n<p>If the required rate is changed to 10% effective,\u00a0 the present value of inflows becomes $299,315.12 and the present value of outflows becomes $236,363.64 so that:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">[latex]NPV=$299,315.12 - $236,363.64 = $62,951.48[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>Similarly we can establish the following values:<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin: auto;\">\n<table class=\"aligncenter\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Required Rate<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NPV<\/td>\n<td>$5,156.73<\/td>\n<td>-$2,927.98<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It should be clear that the rate which would make NPV = 0 is between 16% and 17% effective. From the graph below we can see that this value, the <strong>internal rate of return <\/strong>of this project, is about 16.6%.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4128\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4128\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-4128\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/971\/2020\/05\/IRRvsNPV-300x146.png\" alt=\"This graph shows the NPV on the y-axis, and the MARR on the x-axis\" width=\"300\" height=\"146\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/971\/2020\/05\/IRRvsNPV-300x146.png 300w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/971\/2020\/05\/IRRvsNPV-65x32.png 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/971\/2020\/05\/IRRvsNPV-225x110.png 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/971\/2020\/05\/IRRvsNPV-350x171.png 350w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/971\/2020\/05\/IRRvsNPV.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4128\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">NPV at different MARR values.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The internal rate of return can be obtained from business calculators. In the case of the BAII Plus, place the cash flows in the calculator as for the NPV, remembering to clear all ([2ND][CF][2ND][CE|C]) before entering:<\/p>\n<table class=\"grid aligncenter\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>CF0 = -200,000<\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C01 = -40,000<\/td>\n<td>F01 = 1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C02 = 50,000<\/td>\n<td>F02 = 3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C03 = 300,000<\/td>\n<td>F03 = 1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>and then pressing [IRR][CPT]<\/p>\n<p>You should see the answer, IRR= 16.63227%<\/p>\n<p>Note that this is a solution to the equation:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">[latex]\\begin{align*}  \\text{PV Inflows} &= \\text{PV Outflows}\\\\  \\frac{$50,000}{(1+i)^2}+\\frac{$50,000}{(1+i)^3}+\\frac{$50,000}{(1+i)^4} +\\frac{$300,000}{(1+i)^5} &= $200,000 +\\frac{$400,000}{(1+i)^1}  \\end{align*}[\/latex]<\/p>\n<p>Which is quite difficult to solve by hand.<\/p>\n<p>The answer in your calculator will always be a <strong>periodic rate <\/strong>for whatever period was used for the flows. Since the cash flows were yearly, the rate is an effective rate in this case.\u00a0 Since we are working with estimates, it is not uncommon to work exclusively with annual rates, as we do in this textbook.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Your Own Notes<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Are there any notes you want to take from this section? Is there anything you&#8217;d like to copy and paste below?<\/li>\n<li>These notes are for you only (they will not be stored anywhere)<\/li>\n<li>Make sure to download them at the end to use as a reference<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div id=\"h5p-1\">\n<div class=\"h5p-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe id=\"h5p-iframe-1\" class=\"h5p-iframe\" data-content-id=\"1\" style=\"height:1px\" src=\"about:blank\" frameBorder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"Key takeaways, notes and comments from this section document tool.\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":883,"menu_order":5,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-599","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":48,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/883"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/599\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4129,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/599\/revisions\/4129"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/48"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/599\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=599"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=599"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/businessmathematics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}