Overview
Framework Structure
The framework is structured into Domains, Competency Areas within each Domain, and groups of Competencieswithin each Competency Area (Figure 2).
Within the CACF, competency definitions include clear competency statements and performance criteria. Competencies are organized within each competency area and performance criteria benchmarked to levels of complexity (Figure 3) which relate to the increasing amount of autonomy, responsibility, accountability, impact, and expertise that each requires.
For example:
- The lowest level specifies performance criteria for those working under direct supervision with limited autonomy and expertise (i.e., supporting roles)
- Middle levels specify performance criteria for those with increasing autonomy, expertise, and responsibility (i.e., functional, technical, and supervisory roles)
- The highest level specifies performance criteria for those with the greatest autonomy and accountability (i.e., strategic and leadership roles)
CACF v2 Framework Levels
Level # | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Level Name | React/Follow | Act/Apply | Anticipate/Initiate/Enable | Lead/Strategize |
Autonomy |
|
|
|
|
Accountability |
|
|
|
|
Expertise |
|
|
|
|
Responsibility |
|
|
|
|
Complexity |
|
|
|
|
Figure 3: CACFv2 Levels of Complexity
Competencies at different levels of complexity in one competency area include differences in verbs used and context, such as the example in Figure 3
![](https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/cacfv2/wp-content/uploads/sites/2144/2023/12/Competency-example.png)
Each competency descriptor includes both performance criteria (measurable behaviours) and references to supporting knowledge, skills, and attributes
Performance Criteria
Performance criteria are the behaviours that must be demonstrated to show proficiency in the competency. These are used as the basis for assessment. How these are measured are up to users of the framework when developing assessment tools.
Supporting Knowledge, Skills, and Attributes
Supporting knowledge, skills, and attributes related to each competency may include base knowledge and skills that apply to a set of competencies (such as a whole domain or sub-domain) as well as those specific to particular competencies and/or levels within the framework. For example, a base level of knowledge about climate change may be expected of everyone, but a deeper level of expertise would be required for certain competencies and roles.
Context and Application
The framework provides some examples of related context and application of the competencies for different target groups. This is not intended to be exhaustive, but solely to illustrate examples of the competencies in practice.
A competency integrates related knowledge, skills, and attributes (KSAs) that contribute to individual and organizational performance.
Additional definitions:
The specific and measurable combination of knowledge, skills and attributes that result in the performance of an activity or task to a defined level of expectation or performance standard.
(from the Open Competency Toolkit)
The Government of Canada defines competencies as “the combined utilization of personal abilities and attributes, skills and knowledge to effectively perform a job, role, function, task, or duty.” (see Skills and Competencies Taxonomy)