{"id":26,"date":"2021-02-04T12:05:12","date_gmt":"2021-02-04T17:05:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/?post_type=front-matter&p=26"},"modified":"2021-10-06T14:29:28","modified_gmt":"2021-10-06T18:29:28","slug":"list-of-figures","status":"publish","type":"front-matter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/front-matter\/list-of-figures\/","title":{"raw":"List of Figures","rendered":"List of Figures"},"content":{"raw":"\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Figure<\/th>\r\nSection<\/th>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/thead>\r\n
Figure 1\u20111 Modern design process for a system or component<\/a><\/td>\r\n1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u20111 Lagrangian surface visualized in space<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u20112 A sketch for visualizing Euler-Lagrange's equation<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u20113 A frictionless mass-spring system<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u20114 Sketch for variation of \u00a0for an arbitrary<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u20115 A mass-spring system with three degrees of freedom<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.11<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u20116 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.11<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u20117 A mass-spring-damper system with two degrees of freedom<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.12<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u20118 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.12<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u20119 A two-loop electrical circuit with source<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.13<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201110 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.13<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201111 A compound Atwood's machine.<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.14<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201112 Atwood\u2019s machine<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.15<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201113 A complex vibrating mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.16<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201114 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.16<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201115 Pendulum with oscillating pivot<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.17<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201116 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.17<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201117 A pendulum attached to a mass-spring-damper system<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.18<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201118 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.18<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201119 A particle moving on a circular ring<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.19<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201120 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.19<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 2\u201121 An extensible robotic arm carrying a load<\/a><\/td>\r\n2.20<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u20111 Sketch of a mechanical system with its components category types<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u20112 Bond graph power direction and associated effort and flow definitions, B receives power from A<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u20113 Causality assignment definition and directions of effort and flow between elements A and B<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u20114 Causality assignments for an I-element, with preferred integral causality indicated by dashed circle (left) and derivative causality (right)<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u20115 Block diagram (left) and equivalent bond graph for an I-element with assigned integral causality and state variable<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u20116 Block diagram (left) and equivalent bond graph for an I-element with assigned derivative causality<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u20117 Causality assignments for a C-element, with preferred one indicated by dashed circle, integral causality (right) and derivative causality (left)<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u20118 Block diagram (left) and equivalent bond graph for a C-element with assigned integral causality and state variable<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u20119 Block diagram (left) and equivalent bond graph for a C-element with assigned derivative causality<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u201110 Causality assignments for an R-element<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u201111 Block diagrams (left) and equivalent bond graph for an R-element with assigned causality<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u201112 Bond graph symbols for effort source (left) and flow source (right) with their assigned causalities<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u201113 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> symbol for 1-junction element with four connecting bonds, corresponding causalities, and strong bond identified with thick half-arrow<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u201114 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> symbol for 0-junction element with four connecting bonds, corresponding causalities, and strong bond identified with thick half-arrow<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u201115 Block diagrams (left) and equivalent bond graphs for a TF-element with related assigned causalities\u2014inputs are shown with thick arrows<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u201116 Block diagrams (left) and equivalent bond graphs for a GY-element with related assigned causalities\u2014inputs are shown with thick arrows<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.4.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u201117 Consistency of integral causality assignment and state variable for an I-element with parameter m<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.5.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 3\u201118 Consistency of integral causality assignment and state variable for a C-element with parameter c<\/a><\/td>\r\n3.5.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4\u20111 A mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4\u20112 Bond graph model for a one-DOF mass-spring-damper system<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4\u20113 Simplified bond graph model for a one-DOF mass-spring-damper system<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4\u20114\u00a0 A two-DOF mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4-5 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a two-DOF mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4-6 A three-DOF mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4-7 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a three-DOF mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4-8 Kinetics of a one-DOF mechanical system with showing the stream of efforts with its bond graph model<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4-9 Kinematics of a one-DOF mechanical system with showing the stream of flows with its bond graph model<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4-10 Traditional approach for system simulation and design<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.7.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 4-11 Modern approach for system simulation and design<\/a><\/td>\r\n4.7.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 5\u20111 The 20-sim Editor interface<\/a><\/td>\r\n5.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 5\u20112\u00a0 The 20-sim Simulator interface<\/a><\/td>\r\n5.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 5\u20113 Process steps for design of a system using the modeling, simulation and analysis<\/a><\/td>\r\n5.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 5\u20114 Sketch for a car seat mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n5.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 5\u20115 Bode graph model for a car seat<\/a><\/td>\r\n5.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 5\u20116 Sketch for a cart system carrying a load<\/a><\/td>\r\n5.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 5\u20117 Bond graph model for the cart carrying a load<\/a><\/td>\r\n5.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u20111 Decomposition of 2D rigid-body motion into translation and rotation<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u20112 Gear and shaft mechanical system sketch<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u20113 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a gear shaft system, built in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u20114 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a gear shaft system, derivative causalities removed<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u20115 A double pinion-rack mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u20116 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the double pinion-rack system<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u20117 A mass-spring-damper system on an inclined plane<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u20118 Bond graph model for the mass-spring-damper system on an inclined plane<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u20119 Half-car mechanical system sketch<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.7<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u201110 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a half-car mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.7<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u201111 A mass-spring-damper mechanical system attached to a lever<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.8<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u201112 A mass-spring-damper mechanical system attached to a beam<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.9<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u201113 Two moving mass-spring system attached to a lever<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.10<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 6\u201114 A two-pulley mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n6.11<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u20111 Sign convention for electrical current through passive elements, passive sign convention<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u20112 Electrical power sign for several elements according to passive sign convention<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u20113 Sketch for a RCL electrical circuit in series<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u20114 Bond graph model for a RCL electrical circuit in series<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u20115 Simplified bond graph model for a RCL electrical circuit in series<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u20116 Sketch for a RCL electrical circuit in parallel<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u20117 Bond graph model for a RCL electrical circuit in parallel<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u20118 A two-loop RCL electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u20119 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the two-loop RCL electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u201110 A three-loop electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.7<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u201111 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the three-loop RCL electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.7<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u201112 A Wheatstone bridge electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.8<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u201113 Bond graph model for the Wheatstone bridge circuit<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.8<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u201114 A multi-loop electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.9<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u201115 Bond graph model for the multi-loop electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.9<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u201116 A multi-loop electrical circuit with transformer<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.10<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 7\u201117 Bond graph model for the multi-loop electric circuit with transformer<\/a><\/td>\r\n7.10<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 8\u20111 Sketches for pressure drop in a pipe and a storage tank<\/a><\/td>\r\n8.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 8\u20112 Sketch for a control volume of flowing fluid in a pipe<\/a><\/td>\r\n8.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 8\u20113 Sketch of velocity profile for a Hagen-Poiseuille flow in a pipe<\/a><\/td>\r\n8.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 8\u20114 Sketch for a two-tank hydraulic system<\/a><\/td>\r\n8.8<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 8\u20115\u00a0 Bond graph model for a two-tank hydraulic system<\/a><\/td>\r\n8.8<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 8\u20116 A hydraulic system with pump<\/a><\/td>\r\n8.10<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 8\u20117 Bond graph model for the pump-reservoir-valve hydraulic system<\/a><\/td>\r\n8.10<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 8\u20118 A hydraulic lift system<\/a><\/td>\r\n8.11<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 8\u20119 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for hydraulic lift system<\/a><\/td>\r\n8.11<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 9\u20111 A car brake hydro-mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n9.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 9\u20112 Bond graph model for the car brake hydro-mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n9.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 9\u20113 An Electro-mechanical system with load<\/a><\/td>\r\n9.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 9\u20114 Bond graph model for an electro-mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\r\n9.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 9\u20115 A drive shaft mechanical system carrying a torsional load<\/a><\/td>\r\n9.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 9\u20116 Bond graph model for the drive shaft mechanical system carrying a torsional load<\/a><\/td>\r\n9.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 9\u20117 An inverted double pendulum system<\/a><\/td>\r\n9.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 9\u20118 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the inverted double pendulum<\/a><\/td>\r\n9.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 10\u20111 Linear system sketch for processing inputs and outputs<\/a><\/td>\r\n10.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 10\u20112 Linear System Editor interface in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n10.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 10\u20113 Transfer Function Editor interface in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n10.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 10\u20114 Bode plots for a PI controller<\/a><\/td>\r\n10.4<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 10\u20115 Model Linearization interface in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n10.4.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 10\u20116 Typical Bode plots for a system<\/a><\/td>\r\n10.4.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 10\u20117 Bode plots for the transfer function<\/a><\/td>\r\n10.5<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 10\u20118 Mechanical system sketch for Example given in section 10-6<\/a><\/td>\r\n10.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 10\u20119 Bode plots for mechanical system given in section 10-6<\/a><\/td>\r\n10.6<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 11\u20111 Implementing gravity force for a bond graph model, in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\r\n11.3<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 11\u20112 A mechanical system sketch<\/a><\/td>\r\n11.4.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 11\u20113 Bond graph model for the mechanical system with labelled power bonds<\/a><\/td>\r\n11.4.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 11\u20114 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the electrical system with labelled power bonds<\/a><\/td>\r\n11.4.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 11\u20115 A b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with derivative causality, colour-coded<\/a><\/td>\r\n11.5.1<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 11\u20116 A b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with algebraic loop causality<\/a><\/td>\r\n11.5.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 11\u20117 The b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with removed algebraic loop-selecting R3<\/a><\/td>\r\n11.5.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 11\u20118 The b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with removed algebraic loop-selecting R2<\/a><\/td>\r\n11.5.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
Figure 11\u20119 The b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with removed algebraic loop-selecting R1<\/a><\/td>\r\n11.5.2<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n ","rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Figure<\/th>\nSection<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Figure 1\u20111 Modern design process for a system or component<\/a><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u20111 Lagrangian surface visualized in space<\/a><\/td>\n2.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u20112 A sketch for visualizing Euler-Lagrange’s equation<\/a><\/td>\n2.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u20113 A frictionless mass-spring system<\/a><\/td>\n2.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u20114 Sketch for variation of \u00a0for an arbitrary<\/a><\/td>\n2.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u20115 A mass-spring system with three degrees of freedom<\/a><\/td>\n2.11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u20116 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n2.11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u20117 A mass-spring-damper system with two degrees of freedom<\/a><\/td>\n2.12<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u20118 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n2.12<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u20119 A two-loop electrical circuit with source<\/a><\/td>\n2.13<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201110 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n2.13<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201111 A compound Atwood’s machine.<\/a><\/td>\n2.14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201112 Atwood\u2019s machine<\/a><\/td>\n2.15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201113 A complex vibrating mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n2.16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201114 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n2.16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201115 Pendulum with oscillating pivot<\/a><\/td>\n2.17<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201116 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n2.17<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201117 A pendulum attached to a mass-spring-damper system<\/a><\/td>\n2.18<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201118 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n2.18<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201119 A particle moving on a circular ring<\/a><\/td>\n2.19<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201120 Sample results as output from 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n2.19<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 2\u201121 An extensible robotic arm carrying a load<\/a><\/td>\n2.20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u20111 Sketch of a mechanical system with its components category types<\/a><\/td>\n3.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u20112 Bond graph power direction and associated effort and flow definitions, B receives power from A<\/a><\/td>\n3.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u20113 Causality assignment definition and directions of effort and flow between elements A and B<\/a><\/td>\n3.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u20114 Causality assignments for an I-element, with preferred integral causality indicated by dashed circle (left) and derivative causality (right)<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u20115 Block diagram (left) and equivalent bond graph for an I-element with assigned integral causality and state variable<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u20116 Block diagram (left) and equivalent bond graph for an I-element with assigned derivative causality<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u20117 Causality assignments for a C-element, with preferred one indicated by dashed circle, integral causality (right) and derivative causality (left)<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u20118 Block diagram (left) and equivalent bond graph for a C-element with assigned integral causality and state variable<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u20119 Block diagram (left) and equivalent bond graph for a C-element with assigned derivative causality<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u201110 Causality assignments for an R-element<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u201111 Block diagrams (left) and equivalent bond graph for an R-element with assigned causality<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u201112 Bond graph symbols for effort source (left) and flow source (right) with their assigned causalities<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u201113 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> symbol for 1-junction element with four connecting bonds, corresponding causalities, and strong bond identified with thick half-arrow<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u201114 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> symbol for 0-junction element with four connecting bonds, corresponding causalities, and strong bond identified with thick half-arrow<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u201115 Block diagrams (left) and equivalent bond graphs for a TF-element with related assigned causalities\u2014inputs are shown with thick arrows<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u201116 Block diagrams (left) and equivalent bond graphs for a GY-element with related assigned causalities\u2014inputs are shown with thick arrows<\/a><\/td>\n3.4.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u201117 Consistency of integral causality assignment and state variable for an I-element with parameter m<\/a><\/td>\n3.5.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 3\u201118 Consistency of integral causality assignment and state variable for a C-element with parameter c<\/a><\/td>\n3.5.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4\u20111 A mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n4.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4\u20112 Bond graph model for a one-DOF mass-spring-damper system<\/a><\/td>\n4.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4\u20113 Simplified bond graph model for a one-DOF mass-spring-damper system<\/a><\/td>\n4.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4\u20114\u00a0 A two-DOF mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n4.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4-5 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a two-DOF mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n4.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4-6 A three-DOF mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n4.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4-7 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a three-DOF mass-spring-damper mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n4.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4-8 Kinetics of a one-DOF mechanical system with showing the stream of efforts with its bond graph model<\/a><\/td>\n4.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4-9 Kinematics of a one-DOF mechanical system with showing the stream of flows with its bond graph model<\/a><\/td>\n4.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4-10 Traditional approach for system simulation and design<\/a><\/td>\n4.7.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 4-11 Modern approach for system simulation and design<\/a><\/td>\n4.7.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 5\u20111 The 20-sim Editor interface<\/a><\/td>\n5.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 5\u20112\u00a0 The 20-sim Simulator interface<\/a><\/td>\n5.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 5\u20113 Process steps for design of a system using the modeling, simulation and analysis<\/a><\/td>\n5.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 5\u20114 Sketch for a car seat mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n5.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 5\u20115 Bode graph model for a car seat<\/a><\/td>\n5.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 5\u20116 Sketch for a cart system carrying a load<\/a><\/td>\n5.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 5\u20117 Bond graph model for the cart carrying a load<\/a><\/td>\n5.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u20111 Decomposition of 2D rigid-body motion into translation and rotation<\/a><\/td>\n6.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u20112 Gear and shaft mechanical system sketch<\/a><\/td>\n6.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u20113 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a gear shaft system, built in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n6.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u20114 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a gear shaft system, derivative causalities removed<\/a><\/td>\n6.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u20115 A double pinion-rack mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n6.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u20116 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the double pinion-rack system<\/a><\/td>\n6.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u20117 A mass-spring-damper system on an inclined plane<\/a><\/td>\n6.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u20118 Bond graph model for the mass-spring-damper system on an inclined plane<\/a><\/td>\n6.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u20119 Half-car mechanical system sketch<\/a><\/td>\n6.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u201110 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for a half-car mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n6.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u201111 A mass-spring-damper mechanical system attached to a lever<\/a><\/td>\n6.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u201112 A mass-spring-damper mechanical system attached to a beam<\/a><\/td>\n6.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u201113 Two moving mass-spring system attached to a lever<\/a><\/td>\n6.10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 6\u201114 A two-pulley mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n6.11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u20111 Sign convention for electrical current through passive elements, passive sign convention<\/a><\/td>\n7.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u20112 Electrical power sign for several elements according to passive sign convention<\/a><\/td>\n7.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u20113 Sketch for a RCL electrical circuit in series<\/a><\/td>\n7.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u20114 Bond graph model for a RCL electrical circuit in series<\/a><\/td>\n7.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u20115 Simplified bond graph model for a RCL electrical circuit in series<\/a><\/td>\n7.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u20116 Sketch for a RCL electrical circuit in parallel<\/a><\/td>\n7.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u20117 Bond graph model for a RCL electrical circuit in parallel<\/a><\/td>\n7.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u20118 A two-loop RCL electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\n7.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u20119 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the two-loop RCL electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\n7.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u201110 A three-loop electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\n7.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u201111 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the three-loop RCL electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\n7.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u201112 A Wheatstone bridge electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\n7.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u201113 Bond graph model for the Wheatstone bridge circuit<\/a><\/td>\n7.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u201114 A multi-loop electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\n7.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u201115 Bond graph model for the multi-loop electrical circuit<\/a><\/td>\n7.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u201116 A multi-loop electrical circuit with transformer<\/a><\/td>\n7.10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 7\u201117 Bond graph model for the multi-loop electric circuit with transformer<\/a><\/td>\n7.10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 8\u20111 Sketches for pressure drop in a pipe and a storage tank<\/a><\/td>\n8.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 8\u20112 Sketch for a control volume of flowing fluid in a pipe<\/a><\/td>\n8.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 8\u20113 Sketch of velocity profile for a Hagen-Poiseuille flow in a pipe<\/a><\/td>\n8.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 8\u20114 Sketch for a two-tank hydraulic system<\/a><\/td>\n8.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 8\u20115\u00a0 Bond graph model for a two-tank hydraulic system<\/a><\/td>\n8.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 8\u20116 A hydraulic system with pump<\/a><\/td>\n8.10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 8\u20117 Bond graph model for the pump-reservoir-valve hydraulic system<\/a><\/td>\n8.10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 8\u20118 A hydraulic lift system<\/a><\/td>\n8.11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 8\u20119 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for hydraulic lift system<\/a><\/td>\n8.11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 9\u20111 A car brake hydro-mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n9.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 9\u20112 Bond graph model for the car brake hydro-mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n9.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 9\u20113 An Electro-mechanical system with load<\/a><\/td>\n9.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 9\u20114 Bond graph model for an electro-mechanical system<\/a><\/td>\n9.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 9\u20115 A drive shaft mechanical system carrying a torsional load<\/a><\/td>\n9.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 9\u20116 Bond graph model for the drive shaft mechanical system carrying a torsional load<\/a><\/td>\n9.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 9\u20117 An inverted double pendulum system<\/a><\/td>\n9.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 9\u20118 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the inverted double pendulum<\/a><\/td>\n9.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 10\u20111 Linear system sketch for processing inputs and outputs<\/a><\/td>\n10.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 10\u20112 Linear System Editor interface in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n10.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 10\u20113 Transfer Function Editor interface in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n10.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 10\u20114 Bode plots for a PI controller<\/a><\/td>\n10.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 10\u20115 Model Linearization interface in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n10.4.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 10\u20116 Typical Bode plots for a system<\/a><\/td>\n10.4.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 10\u20117 Bode plots for the transfer function<\/a><\/td>\n10.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 10\u20118 Mechanical system sketch for Example given in section 10-6<\/a><\/td>\n10.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 10\u20119 Bode plots for mechanical system given in section 10-6<\/a><\/td>\n10.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 11\u20111 Implementing gravity force for a bond graph model, in 20-sim<\/a><\/td>\n11.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 11\u20112 A mechanical system sketch<\/a><\/td>\n11.4.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 11\u20113 Bond graph model for the mechanical system with labelled power bonds<\/a><\/td>\n11.4.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 11\u20114 <\/a>Bond graph<\/a> model for the electrical system with labelled power bonds<\/a><\/td>\n11.4.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 11\u20115 A b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with derivative causality, colour-coded<\/a><\/td>\n11.5.1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 11\u20116 A b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with algebraic loop causality<\/a><\/td>\n11.5.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 11\u20117 The b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with removed algebraic loop-selecting R3<\/a><\/td>\n11.5.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 11\u20118 The b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with removed algebraic loop-selecting R2<\/a><\/td>\n11.5.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Figure 11\u20119 The b<\/a>ond graph<\/a> model with removed algebraic loop-selecting R1<\/a><\/td>\n11.5.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":801,"menu_order":5,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"front-matter-type":[15],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-26","front-matter","type-front-matter","status-publish","hentry","front-matter-type-list-of-illustrations"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter\/26","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/front-matter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/801"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter\/26\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2354,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter\/26\/revisions\/2354"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter\/26\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"front-matter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter-type?post=26"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=26"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/engineeringsystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=26"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}