{"id":143,"date":"2025-10-03T13:37:21","date_gmt":"2025-10-03T17:37:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=143"},"modified":"2026-05-25T13:42:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-25T17:42:11","slug":"4-1-highlights","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/chapter\/4-1-highlights\/","title":{"raw":"4.1 Highlights","rendered":"4.1 Highlights"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"textbox textbox--key-takeaways\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">\r\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Highlights<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/header>\r\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\r\n<div>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><strong>Evaluation definitions<\/strong>: There are many definitions of evaluation, and these tend to evolve over time and vary depending on the authors and the changing role of evaluation.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Evaluation in the 21st century<\/strong>: Evaluation can be defined as an engaging process that combines different, complementary inquiry approaches to support decision-making while contributing to sense-making, value creation, positive ecosystems, and social change.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Purpose<\/strong>: Evaluation provides valuable information at all stages of the policy cycle, from analyzing needs to designing the intervention, supporting its implementation, and determining if it should be continued.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Evaluation questions<\/strong>: Evaluation can focus on analyzing the relationships between the context, resources, activities, and results, or, through monitoring, it can provide information on each of these elements.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Bricolage<\/strong>: In the Anthropocene and post-truth era, a bricolage approach to evaluation may be necessary to navigate complex and uncertain contexts.<\/li>\r\n \t<li><strong>Coherence<\/strong>: Coherence is crucial when designing an evaluation project. It involves aligning the evaluation questions, design, and methods.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n&nbsp;","rendered":"<div class=\"textbox textbox--key-takeaways\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">\n<p class=\"textbox__title\">Highlights<\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<div>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Evaluation definitions<\/strong>: There are many definitions of evaluation, and these tend to evolve over time and vary depending on the authors and the changing role of evaluation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evaluation in the 21st century<\/strong>: Evaluation can be defined as an engaging process that combines different, complementary inquiry approaches to support decision-making while contributing to sense-making, value creation, positive ecosystems, and social change.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Purpose<\/strong>: Evaluation provides valuable information at all stages of the policy cycle, from analyzing needs to designing the intervention, supporting its implementation, and determining if it should be continued.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evaluation questions<\/strong>: Evaluation can focus on analyzing the relationships between the context, resources, activities, and results, or, through monitoring, it can provide information on each of these elements.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Bricolage<\/strong>: In the Anthropocene and post-truth era, a bricolage approach to evaluation may be necessary to navigate complex and uncertain contexts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Coherence<\/strong>: Coherence is crucial when designing an evaluation project. It involves aligning the evaluation questions, design, and methods.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"menu_order":1,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[49],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-143","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","chapter-type-numberless"],"part":141,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/143","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/143\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":555,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/143\/revisions\/555"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/141"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/143\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=143"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=143"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}