{"id":443,"date":"2025-10-14T15:35:42","date_gmt":"2025-10-14T19:35:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/?post_type=chapter&p=443"},"modified":"2026-05-29T14:07:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-29T18:07:11","slug":"5-7-references","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/chapter\/5-7-references\/","title":{"raw":"5.7 References","rendered":"5.7 References"},"content":{"raw":"Brousselle, A. (2024). Post-truth and pathways for evaluators. Evaluation<\/em>, 30<\/em>(4), 533-549. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/13563890241265859<\/a>\r\n\r\nBrousselle, A., & McDavid, J. (2021). Evaluation for Planetary Health. Evaluation<\/em>, 27<\/em>(2), 168-183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1356389020952462<\/a>\r\n\r\nCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Atlanta, Georgia<\/em>.\r\n\r\nChilisa, B., & Mertens, D. M. (2021). Indigenous Made in Africa Evaluation Frameworks: Addressing Epistemic Violence and Contributing to Social Transformation. The American Journal of Evaluation<\/em>, 42<\/em>(2), 241\u2013253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1098214020948601<\/a>\r\n\r\nChouinard, J. A., & Cram, F. (2020). Culturally responsive approaches to evaluation\u202f: empirical implications for theory and practice<\/em>. SAGE Publications, Inc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781506368559<\/a>\r\n\r\nClarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Ground theory after the postmodern turn<\/em>. Sage. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781412985833<\/a>\r\n\r\nContandriopoulos, D., & Brousselle, A. (2012). Evaluation Models and Evaluation Use. Evaluation<\/em>, 18<\/em>(1), 61-77. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1356389011430371<\/a>\r\n\r\nCram, F. (2018a). Conclusion: Lessons About Indigenous Evaluation. In F. Cram, K. A. Tibbetts, & J. LaFrance (Eds.), Indigenous Evaluation<\/em> (Vol. 159, pp. 121-133).\r\n\r\nCram, F. (2018b). Editors\u2019 Notes: A Stepping Stone in Indigenous Evaluation. In F. Cram, K. A. Tibbetts, & J. LaFrance (Eds.), Indigenous Evaluation<\/em> (pp. 7-16). New Directions for Evaluation. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ev.20327<\/a>\r\n\r\nEvans, J., Bremner, L. K., Johnston, A. L. K., Rowe, G., & Sasakamoose, J. (2020). Exploring Indigenous Approaches to Evaluation and Research in the Context of Victim Services and Supports.<\/em> https:\/\/www.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/rp-pr\/jr\/eiaer-eaame\/docs\/rsd_rr2020-indigenous-approaches-to-evaluation-and-research-eng.pdf<\/a>\r\n\r\nFischer, F. (2019). Knowledge politics and post-truth in climate denial: on the social construction of alternative facts. Critical Policy Studies<\/em>, 13<\/em>(2), 133-152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19460171.2019.1602067<\/a>\r\n\r\nFischer, F. (2021). Truth and post-truth in public policy\u202f: interpreting the arguments<\/em>. Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/elements\/truth-and-posttruth-in-public-policy\/EF614DD10AF388DAE0ABB644539AF668<\/a>\r\n\r\nGorski, D., & Yamey, G. (2021). Covid-19 and the new merchants of doubt. The BMJ Opinion<\/em>. https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/09\/13\/covid-19-and-the-new-merchants-of-doubt\/<\/a>\r\n\r\nGovernment of Canada. (2014). Chapter 9: Research involving the First Nations, Inuit and M\u00e9tis People of Canada in the latest edition of Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans<\/em>. http:\/\/www.pre.ethics.gc.ca\/eng\/policy-politique\/initiatives\/tcps2-eptc2\/chapter9-chapitre9\/<\/a>\r\n\r\nGuba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). The coming of age of evaluation. In E. G. Guba & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Fourth Generation Evaluation<\/em> (pp. 21-49). Sage Publications.\r\n\r\nKlein, G. (2011). Critical thinking. Theoretical Issues Ergonomics Science<\/em>, 12<\/em>(3), 210\u2013224.\r\n\r\nLoseke, D. (2013). Methodological thinking: Basic principles of social research design<\/em>. Sage. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781071802700<\/a>\r\n\r\nMontrosse-Moorhead, B., Bitar, K., Ar\u00e9valo, J., & Rishko-Porcescu, A. (2019). Revolution in the making: Evaluation \u201cdone well\u201d in the era of the SDGs with a Youth Participatory Approach. In R. van den Berg, C. Magro, & S. Salinas Mulder (Eds.), Evaluation for transformational change: Opportunities and challenges for the Sustainable Development Goals<\/em>. International Development Evaluation Association (IDEAS).\r\n\r\nPatton, M. (1988). The evaluator\u2019s responsibility for utilization. American Journal of Evaluation<\/em>, 9<\/em>, 5\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0886-1633(88)80059-X<\/a>\r\n\r\nPatton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-Focused Evaluation<\/em> (3rd edition ed.). Sage Publications.\r\n\r\nPatton, M. Q. (2012). Essential of Utilization-Focused Evaluation<\/em>. Sage.\r\n\r\nPatton, M. Q. (2018). A historical perspective on the evolution of evaluation thinking In A. T. Vo & T. Archibald (Eds.), Evaluative Thinking<\/em> (Vol. 158, pp. 11-28). New Directions for Evaluation. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ev.20325<\/a>\r\n\r\nStern, E. (2015). Impact Evaluation. A Guide for Commissioners and Managers<\/em>. https:\/\/www.bond.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/impact_evaluation_guide_0515.pdf<\/a>\r\n\r\nUnited Nations (2015) Paris Agreement<\/em>. https:\/\/unfccc.int\/files\/essential_background\/convention\/application\/pdf\/english_paris_agreement.pdf<\/a>\r\n\r\nUnited Nations (2022) Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework<\/em>, UN Environment Program. https:\/\/www.cbd.int\/doc\/decisions\/cop-15\/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf<\/a>\r\n\r\nWeiss, C. (1988). If program decisions hinged only on information: a response to Patton. American Journal of Evaluation<\/em>, 9<\/em>(15), 15\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0886-1633(88)80042-4<\/a>\r\n\r\nYanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis<\/em>. SAGE Publications. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781412983747<\/a>","rendered":"

Brousselle, A. (2024). Post-truth and pathways for evaluators. Evaluation<\/em>, 30<\/em>(4), 533-549. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/13563890241265859<\/a><\/p>\n

Brousselle, A., & McDavid, J. (2021). Evaluation for Planetary Health. Evaluation<\/em>, 27<\/em>(2), 168-183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1356389020952462<\/a><\/p>\n

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Atlanta, Georgia<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Chilisa, B., & Mertens, D. M. (2021). Indigenous Made in Africa Evaluation Frameworks: Addressing Epistemic Violence and Contributing to Social Transformation. The American Journal of Evaluation<\/em>, 42<\/em>(2), 241\u2013253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1098214020948601<\/a><\/p>\n

Chouinard, J. A., & Cram, F. (2020). Culturally responsive approaches to evaluation\u202f: empirical implications for theory and practice<\/em>. SAGE Publications, Inc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781506368559<\/a><\/p>\n

Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Ground theory after the postmodern turn<\/em>. Sage. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781412985833<\/a><\/p>\n

Contandriopoulos, D., & Brousselle, A. (2012). Evaluation Models and Evaluation Use. Evaluation<\/em>, 18<\/em>(1), 61-77. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1356389011430371<\/a><\/p>\n

Cram, F. (2018a). Conclusion: Lessons About Indigenous Evaluation. In F. Cram, K. A. Tibbetts, & J. LaFrance (Eds.), Indigenous Evaluation<\/em> (Vol. 159, pp. 121-133).<\/p>\n

Cram, F. (2018b). Editors\u2019 Notes: A Stepping Stone in Indigenous Evaluation. In F. Cram, K. A. Tibbetts, & J. LaFrance (Eds.), Indigenous Evaluation<\/em> (pp. 7-16). New Directions for Evaluation. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ev.20327<\/a><\/p>\n

Evans, J., Bremner, L. K., Johnston, A. L. K., Rowe, G., & Sasakamoose, J. (2020). Exploring Indigenous Approaches to Evaluation and Research in the Context of Victim Services and Supports.<\/em> https:\/\/www.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/rp-pr\/jr\/eiaer-eaame\/docs\/rsd_rr2020-indigenous-approaches-to-evaluation-and-research-eng.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Fischer, F. (2019). Knowledge politics and post-truth in climate denial: on the social construction of alternative facts. Critical Policy Studies<\/em>, 13<\/em>(2), 133-152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19460171.2019.1602067<\/a><\/p>\n

Fischer, F. (2021). Truth and post-truth in public policy\u202f: interpreting the arguments<\/em>. Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/elements\/truth-and-posttruth-in-public-policy\/EF614DD10AF388DAE0ABB644539AF668<\/a><\/p>\n

Gorski, D., & Yamey, G. (2021). Covid-19 and the new merchants of doubt. The BMJ Opinion<\/em>. https:\/\/blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2021\/09\/13\/covid-19-and-the-new-merchants-of-doubt\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Government of Canada. (2014). Chapter 9: Research involving the First Nations, Inuit and M\u00e9tis People of Canada in the latest edition of Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans<\/em>. http:\/\/www.pre.ethics.gc.ca\/eng\/policy-politique\/initiatives\/tcps2-eptc2\/chapter9-chapitre9\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). The coming of age of evaluation. In E. G. Guba & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Fourth Generation Evaluation<\/em> (pp. 21-49). Sage Publications.<\/p>\n

Klein, G. (2011). Critical thinking. Theoretical Issues Ergonomics Science<\/em>, 12<\/em>(3), 210\u2013224.<\/p>\n

Loseke, D. (2013). Methodological thinking: Basic principles of social research design<\/em>. Sage. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781071802700<\/a><\/p>\n

Montrosse-Moorhead, B., Bitar, K., Ar\u00e9valo, J., & Rishko-Porcescu, A. (2019). Revolution in the making: Evaluation \u201cdone well\u201d in the era of the SDGs with a Youth Participatory Approach. In R. van den Berg, C. Magro, & S. Salinas Mulder (Eds.), Evaluation for transformational change: Opportunities and challenges for the Sustainable Development Goals<\/em>. International Development Evaluation Association (IDEAS).<\/p>\n

Patton, M. (1988). The evaluator\u2019s responsibility for utilization. American Journal of Evaluation<\/em>, 9<\/em>, 5\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0886-1633(88)80059-X<\/a><\/p>\n

Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-Focused Evaluation<\/em> (3rd edition ed.). Sage Publications.<\/p>\n

Patton, M. Q. (2012). Essential of Utilization-Focused Evaluation<\/em>. Sage.<\/p>\n

Patton, M. Q. (2018). A historical perspective on the evolution of evaluation thinking In A. T. Vo & T. Archibald (Eds.), Evaluative Thinking<\/em> (Vol. 158, pp. 11-28). New Directions for Evaluation. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ev.20325<\/a><\/p>\n

Stern, E. (2015). Impact Evaluation. A Guide for Commissioners and Managers<\/em>. https:\/\/www.bond.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/impact_evaluation_guide_0515.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

United Nations (2015) Paris Agreement<\/em>. https:\/\/unfccc.int\/files\/essential_background\/convention\/application\/pdf\/english_paris_agreement.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

United Nations (2022) Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework<\/em>, UN Environment Program. https:\/\/www.cbd.int\/doc\/decisions\/cop-15\/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Weiss, C. (1988). If program decisions hinged only on information: a response to Patton. American Journal of Evaluation<\/em>, 9<\/em>(15), 15\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0886-1633(88)80042-4<\/a><\/p>\n

Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis<\/em>. SAGE Publications. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781412983747<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"menu_order":7,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[49],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-443","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","chapter-type-numberless"],"part":161,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/443\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":790,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/443\/revisions\/790"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/161"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/443\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=443"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=443"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/foundationsofevaluation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}