{"id":104,"date":"2023-01-27T17:28:38","date_gmt":"2023-01-27T22:28:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/chapter\/__unknown__\/"},"modified":"2023-12-30T21:37:17","modified_gmt":"2023-12-31T02:37:17","slug":"property_rights_land_tenure","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/chapter\/property_rights_land_tenure\/","title":{"raw":"Property Rights and Land Tenure","rendered":"Property Rights and Land Tenure"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In our Western society, when something is sought-after or in limited supply then it is considered property.[footnote]Pipes, Richard (1999). <em>Property and Freedom<\/em>. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, p. 81.[\/footnote]\u00a0 And if something is valuable enough to be considered property then it follows that a system of rights would be required to administer its use.\u00a0 It is in this sense that we speak of \u201cproperty rights.\u201d\u00a0 Stated more precisely, the term \"property\" refers to a bundle of rights that governs the use of things.[footnote]Flanagan, Tom, Christopher Alcantara, and Andr\u00e9 Le Dressay (2010). <em>Beyond the Indian Act:\u00a0 Restoring Aboriginal Property Rights<\/em>. Montr\u00e9al: McGill-Queen's University Press, p. 18.[\/footnote]\u00a0 These things can be an idea, such as intellectual property, or an object, such as personal property.\u00a0 Property also refers to the bundle of rights governing the use of land.\u00a0 And since land is both sought-after and in limited supply, we need a system of rights to administer its use.\u00a0 Hence, land use planning, which seeks to co-ordinate a variety of rights to land in an efficient and equitable manner.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The right to the land is not restricted to ownership, at least in the way that we generally use the term.\u00a0 As Flanagan et al. state, \u201cAt first glance, property rights seem to apply to lands or things that are owned, but it is more precise to say that they apply to human conduct.\u00a0 They set out the prerogatives of owners that non-owners must respect, under threat of retaliation from owners or enforcement by a third party such as government.\u201d[footnote]Flanagan et al., p. 18.[\/footnote]\u00a0 Generally speaking, a bundle of property rights may be organised into three categories:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Use Rights, such as the right to occupy, derive income from, or extract natural resources from land;<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Control Rights, including the right to be protected from trespass, nuisance or expropriation; and<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Disposition Rights, such as the right to sell, lease, subdivide or bequeath lands.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Canadian systems of property rights are derived from the traditions of English Common Law, under which title all land is ultimately owned by the Crown and all land is held directly or indirectly by some kind of tenure from the Crown.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tenure, which can be granted individually or collectively, refers to the legal regime in which interests in the Crown\u2019s land are held and may exist in the form of a permit, lease, licence, grant, or some other legal regime which details \u201chow\u201d Crown land is to be held.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A related concept, the doctrine of estates, refers to \u201chow long\u201d land is held for.\u00a0 For example, a land holder may enjoy a life estate, in which interest in a property is granted for the duration of her\/his existence, and after which, legal title reverts back to the Crown.\u00a0 However, the most common form of estate granted is an estate in fee simple in which a land holder may exercise the fullest range of property rights,[footnote]In general terms, fee simple is considered the fullest range of rights.\u00a0 Fee simple can be further distinguished between \u201climited\u201d fee simple and \u201cfull\u201d fee simple. Limited fee simple is described above.\u00a0 In addition to these limited rights, full fee simple also grants rights to subsurface resources, a right that is usually held by the Crown.[\/footnote] and transfer ownership of the fee simple estate hereditarily (or otherwise) in perpetuity.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Therefore, property ownership does not refer to the land itself, but describes the extent to which a land holder, be it an individual or collective, may enjoy the full range of property rights currently afforded under Canadian law -- her or his \"level of interest\" in the land.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div id=\"sdfootnote4sym\"><\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"__UNKNOWN__\">\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">In our Western society, when something is sought-after or in limited supply then it is considered property.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Pipes, Richard (1999). Property and Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, p. 81.\" id=\"return-footnote-104-1\" href=\"#footnote-104-1\" aria-label=\"Footnote 1\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[1]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0 And if something is valuable enough to be considered property then it follows that a system of rights would be required to administer its use.\u00a0 It is in this sense that we speak of \u201cproperty rights.\u201d\u00a0 Stated more precisely, the term &#8220;property&#8221; refers to a bundle of rights that governs the use of things.<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Flanagan, Tom, Christopher Alcantara, and Andr\u00e9 Le Dressay (2010). Beyond the Indian Act:\u00a0 Restoring Aboriginal Property Rights. Montr\u00e9al: McGill-Queen's University Press, p. 18.\" id=\"return-footnote-104-2\" href=\"#footnote-104-2\" aria-label=\"Footnote 2\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[2]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0 These things can be an idea, such as intellectual property, or an object, such as personal property.\u00a0 Property also refers to the bundle of rights governing the use of land.\u00a0 And since land is both sought-after and in limited supply, we need a system of rights to administer its use.\u00a0 Hence, land use planning, which seeks to co-ordinate a variety of rights to land in an efficient and equitable manner.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">The right to the land is not restricted to ownership, at least in the way that we generally use the term.\u00a0 As Flanagan et al. state, \u201cAt first glance, property rights seem to apply to lands or things that are owned, but it is more precise to say that they apply to human conduct.\u00a0 They set out the prerogatives of owners that non-owners must respect, under threat of retaliation from owners or enforcement by a third party such as government.\u201d<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"Flanagan et al., p. 18.\" id=\"return-footnote-104-3\" href=\"#footnote-104-3\" aria-label=\"Footnote 3\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[3]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0 Generally speaking, a bundle of property rights may be organised into three categories:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Use Rights, such as the right to occupy, derive income from, or extract natural resources from land;<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Control Rights, including the right to be protected from trespass, nuisance or expropriation; and<\/li>\n<li class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Disposition Rights, such as the right to sell, lease, subdivide or bequeath lands.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Canadian systems of property rights are derived from the traditions of English Common Law, under which title all land is ultimately owned by the Crown and all land is held directly or indirectly by some kind of tenure from the Crown.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Tenure, which can be granted individually or collectively, refers to the legal regime in which interests in the Crown\u2019s land are held and may exist in the form of a permit, lease, licence, grant, or some other legal regime which details \u201chow\u201d Crown land is to be held.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">A related concept, the doctrine of estates, refers to \u201chow long\u201d land is held for.\u00a0 For example, a land holder may enjoy a life estate, in which interest in a property is granted for the duration of her\/his existence, and after which, legal title reverts back to the Crown.\u00a0 However, the most common form of estate granted is an estate in fee simple in which a land holder may exercise the fullest range of property rights,<a class=\"footnote\" title=\"In general terms, fee simple is considered the fullest range of rights.\u00a0 Fee simple can be further distinguished between \u201climited\u201d fee simple and \u201cfull\u201d fee simple. Limited fee simple is described above.\u00a0 In addition to these limited rights, full fee simple also grants rights to subsurface resources, a right that is usually held by the Crown.\" id=\"return-footnote-104-4\" href=\"#footnote-104-4\" aria-label=\"Footnote 4\"><sup class=\"footnote\">[4]<\/sup><\/a> and transfer ownership of the fee simple estate hereditarily (or otherwise) in perpetuity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\">Therefore, property ownership does not refer to the land itself, but describes the extent to which a land holder, be it an individual or collective, may enjoy the full range of property rights currently afforded under Canadian law &#8212; her or his &#8220;level of interest&#8221; in the land.<\/p>\n<div id=\"sdfootnote4sym\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"before-footnotes clear\" \/><div class=\"footnotes\"><ol><li id=\"footnote-104-1\">Pipes, Richard (1999). <em>Property and Freedom<\/em>. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, p. 81. <a href=\"#return-footnote-104-1\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 1\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-104-2\">Flanagan, Tom, Christopher Alcantara, and Andr\u00e9 Le Dressay (2010). <em>Beyond the Indian Act:\u00a0 Restoring Aboriginal Property Rights<\/em>. Montr\u00e9al: McGill-Queen's University Press, p. 18. <a href=\"#return-footnote-104-2\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 2\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-104-3\">Flanagan et al., p. 18. <a href=\"#return-footnote-104-3\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 3\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><li id=\"footnote-104-4\">In general terms, fee simple is considered the fullest range of rights.\u00a0 Fee simple can be further distinguished between \u201climited\u201d fee simple and \u201cfull\u201d fee simple. Limited fee simple is described above.\u00a0 In addition to these limited rights, full fee simple also grants rights to subsurface resources, a right that is usually held by the Crown. <a href=\"#return-footnote-104-4\" class=\"return-footnote\" aria-label=\"Return to footnote 4\">&crarr;<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"author":1858,"menu_order":13,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"Module.Property Rights","pb_subtitle":"LEARNING MODULE","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":"cc-by-nc-sa"},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[57],"class_list":["post-104","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","license-cc-by-nc-sa"],"part":77,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/104","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1858"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/104\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1251,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/104\/revisions\/1251"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/77"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/104\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=104"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=104"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/landuseplanninginbc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}