{"id":169,"date":"2018-02-22T21:06:47","date_gmt":"2018-02-23T02:06:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/?post_type=chapter&p=169"},"modified":"2018-05-24T14:44:57","modified_gmt":"2018-05-24T18:44:57","slug":"8-1-understanding-communication","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/chapter\/8-1-understanding-communication\/","title":{"raw":"8.1 Understanding Communication","rendered":"8.1 Understanding Communication"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n

Chapter Learning Outcomes<\/h3>\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. Define communication and understand the communication process<\/li>\r\n \t
  2. Understand different types of communication.<\/li>\r\n \t
  3. Explain how communication channels affect communication.<\/li>\r\n \t
  4. Recognize different communication directions within organizations.<\/li>\r\n \t
  5. Identify potential barriers to communication.<\/li>\r\n \t
  6. Understand the role poor listening plays in communication problems.<\/li>\r\n \t
  7. Understand what active listening is.<\/li>\r\n \t
  8. Learn strategies to become a more effective listener.<\/li>\r\n \t
  9. Consider the role of ethics and national culture in communication<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    Communication<\/a><\/span> is vital to organizations\u2014it\u2019s how we coordinate actions and achieve goals. It is defined in Webster\u2019s dictionary as a process by which information is exchanged between individuals through a common system of symbols, signs, or behaviour. We know that 50% to 90% of a manager\u2019s time is spent communicating (Schnake et al., 1990), and communication ability is related to a manager\u2019s performance (Penley et al., 1991). In most work environments, a miscommunication is an annoyance\u2014it can interrupt workflow by causing delays and interpersonal strife. But, in some work arenas, like operating rooms and airplane cockpits, communication can be a matter of life and death.<\/p>\r\n

    So, just how prevalent is miscommunication in the workplace? You may not be surprised to learn that the relationship between miscommunication and negative outcomes is very strong. Data suggest that deficient interpersonal communication was a causal factor in approximately 70% to 80% of all accidents over the last 20 years.[footnote]NASA study cited by Baron, R. (n.d.). Barriers to effective communication: Implications for the cockpit. Retrieved July 3, 2008, from AirlineSafety.com: http:\/\/www.airlinesafety.com\/editorials\/BarriersToCommunication.htm<\/a>.[\/footnote]<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n
    \r\n

    Figure 8.1<\/span><\/p>\r\n\"Men<\/a>\r\n

    At NASA, success depends on strong communication.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n

    Wikimedia Commons<\/a> - public domain.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    Poor communication can also lead to lawsuits. For example, you might think that malpractice suits are filed against doctors based on the outcome of their treatments alone. But a 1997 study of malpractice suits found that a primary influence on whether or not a doctor is sued is the doctor\u2019s communication style. While the combination of a bad outcome and patient unhappiness can quickly lead to litigation, a warm, personal communication style leads to greater patient satisfaction. Simply put, satisfied patients are less likely to sue.[footnote]Communications skills cut malpractice risk\u2014study reveals most important reason that patients decide to file malpractice suits is because of poor communication by physicians and not medical errors. (1997, October). USA Today<\/em>.[\/footnote]<\/p>\r\n

    In business, poor communication costs money and wastes time. One study found that 14% of each workweek is wasted on poor communication (Armour, 1998). In contrast, effective communication is an asset for organizations and individuals alike. Effective communication skills, for example, are an asset for job seekers. A recent study of recruiters at 85 business schools ranked communication and interpersonal skills as the highest skills they were looking for, with 89% of the recruiters saying they were important (Alsop, 2006). On the flip side, good communication can help a company retain its star employees. Surveys find that when employees think their organizations do a good job of keeping them informed about matters that affect them and when they have access to the information they need to do their jobs, they are more satisfied with their employers.[footnote]What are the bottom line results of communicating? (2003, June). Pay for Performance Report<\/em>. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http:\/\/www.mercerHR.com<\/a>.[\/footnote] So can good communication increase a company\u2019s market value? The answer seems to be yes. \u201cWhen you foster ongoing communications internally, you will have more satisfied employees who will be better equipped to effectively communicate with your customers,\u201d says Susan Meisinger, president and CEO of the Society for Human Resource Management. Research finds that organizations that are able to improve their communication integrity also increase their market value by as much as 7% (Meisinger, 2003). We will explore the definition and benefits of effective communication in our next section.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n

    The Communication Process<\/h2>\r\n

    Communication fulfills three main functions within an organization, including coordination, transmission of information, and sharing emotions and feelings. All these functions are vital to a successful organization. The coordination of effort within an organization helps people work toward the same goals. Transmitting information is a vital part of this process. Sharing emotions and feelings bonds teams and unites people in times of celebration and crisis. Effective communication helps people grasp issues, build rapport with coworkers, and achieve consensus. So, how can we communicate effectively? The first step is to understand the communication process.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n
    \r\n

    Figure 8.2<\/span><\/p>\r\n\"Lee<\/a>\r\n

    Lee Iacocca, past president and CEO of Chrysler until his retirement in 1992, said, \u201cYou can have brilliant ideas, but if you can\u2019t get them across, your ideas won\u2019t get you anywhere.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n

    Wikimedia Commons<\/a> - public domain.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    We all exchange information with others countless times each day by phone, e-mail, printed word, and of course, in person. Let us take a moment to see how a typical communication works using this as a guide.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n
    \r\n

    Figure 8.3<\/span>\u00a0Process Model of Communication<\/p>\r\n\"Process<\/a>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    A sender<\/a><\/span>, such as a boss, coworker, or customer, originates the message with a thought. For example, the boss\u2019s thought could be: \u201cGet more printer toner cartridges!<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\r\n

    The sender encodes<\/a><\/span> the message, translating the idea into words.<\/p>\r\n

    The boss may communicate this thought by saying, \u201cHey you guys, let\u2019s order more printer toner cartridges<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\r\n

    The medium<\/a><\/span> of this encoded message may be spoken words, written words, or signs.<\/p>\r\n

    The receiver<\/a><\/span> is the person who receives the message.<\/p>\r\n

    The receiver decodes<\/a><\/span> the message by assigning meaning to the words.<\/p>\r\n

    In this example, our receiver, Bill, has a to-do list a mile long. \u201cThe boss must know how much work I already have<\/em>,\u201d the receiver thinks. Bill\u2019s mind translates his boss\u2019s message as, \u201cCould you order some printer toner cartridges, in addition to everything else I asked you to do this week\u2026if you can find the time<\/em>?\u201d<\/p>\r\n

    The meaning that the receiver assigns may not be the meaning that the sender intended, because of factors such as noise. Noise<\/a><\/span> is anything that interferes with or distorts the message being transformed. Noise can be external in the environment (such as distractions) or it can be within the receiver. For example, the receiver may be extremely nervous and unable to pay attention to the message. Noise can even occur within the sender: The sender may be unwilling to take the time to convey an accurate message, or the words that are chosen can be ambiguous and prone to misinterpretation.<\/p>\r\n

    Picture the next scene. The place: a staff meeting. The time: a few days later. Bill\u2019s boss believes the message about printer toner has been received.<\/p>\r\n

    \u201cAre the printer toner cartridges here yet<\/em>?\u201d Bill\u2019s boss asks.<\/p>\r\n

    \u201cYou never said it was a rush job!<\/em>\u201d Bill protests.<\/p>\r\n

    \u201cBut!<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\r\n

    \u201cBut!<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\r\n

    Miscommunications like these happen in the workplace every day. We\u2019ve seen that miscommunication does occur in the workplace, but how does a miscommunication happen? It helps to think of the communication process. The series of arrows pointing the way from the sender to the receiver and back again can, and often do, fall short of their target.<\/p>\r\n\r\n

    \r\n

    Key Takeaway<\/h3>\r\n

    Communication is vital to organizations. Poor communication is prevalent between senders and receivers. Communication fulfills three functions within organizations, including coordination, the transmission of information, and sharing emotions and feelings. Noise can disrupt or distort communication.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n

    \r\n

    Exercises<\/h3>\r\n
      \r\n \t
    1. Where have you seen the communication process break down at work? At school? At home?<\/li>\r\n \t
    2. Explain how miscommunication might be related to an accident at work.<\/li>\r\n \t
    3. Give an example of noise during the communication process.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n

      References<\/h2>\r\nAlsop, R. (2006, September 20). The top business schools: Recruiters\u2019 M.B.A. picks. Wall Street Journal Online<\/em>. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB115860376846766495.html?mod=2_1245_1<\/a>.\r\n\r\nArmour, S. (1998, September 30). Failure to communicate costly for companies. USA Today<\/em>, p. 1A.\r\n\r\nMeisinger, S. (2003, February). Enhancing communications\u2014Ours and yours. HR Magazine<\/em>. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/hrmagazine\/archive\/0203toc.asp<\/a>.\r\n\r\nPenley, L. E., Alexander, E. R., Jernigan, I. E., & Henwood, C. I. (1991). Communication abilities of managers: The relationship of performance. Journal of Management<\/em>, 17<\/em>, 57\u201376.\r\n\r\nSchnake, M. E., Dumler, M. P., Cochran, D. S., & Barnett, T. R. (1990). Effects of differences in subordinate perceptions of superiors\u2019 communication practices. Journal of Business Communication<\/em>, 27<\/em>, 37\u201350.","rendered":"
      \n

      Chapter Learning Outcomes<\/h3>\n
        \n
      1. Define communication and understand the communication process<\/li>\n
      2. Understand different types of communication.<\/li>\n
      3. Explain how communication channels affect communication.<\/li>\n
      4. Recognize different communication directions within organizations.<\/li>\n
      5. Identify potential barriers to communication.<\/li>\n
      6. Understand the role poor listening plays in communication problems.<\/li>\n
      7. Understand what active listening is.<\/li>\n
      8. Learn strategies to become a more effective listener.<\/li>\n
      9. Consider the role of ethics and national culture in communication<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

        Communication<\/a><\/span> is vital to organizations\u2014it\u2019s how we coordinate actions and achieve goals. It is defined in Webster\u2019s dictionary as a process by which information is exchanged between individuals through a common system of symbols, signs, or behaviour. We know that 50% to 90% of a manager\u2019s time is spent communicating (Schnake et al., 1990), and communication ability is related to a manager\u2019s performance (Penley et al., 1991). In most work environments, a miscommunication is an annoyance\u2014it can interrupt workflow by causing delays and interpersonal strife. But, in some work arenas, like operating rooms and airplane cockpits, communication can be a matter of life and death.<\/p>\n

        So, just how prevalent is miscommunication in the workplace? You may not be surprised to learn that the relationship between miscommunication and negative outcomes is very strong. Data suggest that deficient interpersonal communication was a causal factor in approximately 70% to 80% of all accidents over the last 20 years.[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

        \n
        \n

        Figure 8.1<\/span><\/p>\n

        \"Men<\/a><\/p>\n

        At NASA, success depends on strong communication.<\/p>\n

        \n

        Wikimedia Commons<\/a> – public domain.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

        Poor communication can also lead to lawsuits. For example, you might think that malpractice suits are filed against doctors based on the outcome of their treatments alone. But a 1997 study of malpractice suits found that a primary influence on whether or not a doctor is sued is the doctor\u2019s communication style. While the combination of a bad outcome and patient unhappiness can quickly lead to litigation, a warm, personal communication style leads to greater patient satisfaction. Simply put, satisfied patients are less likely to sue.[2]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

        In business, poor communication costs money and wastes time. One study found that 14% of each workweek is wasted on poor communication (Armour, 1998). In contrast, effective communication is an asset for organizations and individuals alike. Effective communication skills, for example, are an asset for job seekers. A recent study of recruiters at 85 business schools ranked communication and interpersonal skills as the highest skills they were looking for, with 89% of the recruiters saying they were important (Alsop, 2006). On the flip side, good communication can help a company retain its star employees. Surveys find that when employees think their organizations do a good job of keeping them informed about matters that affect them and when they have access to the information they need to do their jobs, they are more satisfied with their employers.[3]<\/sup><\/a> So can good communication increase a company\u2019s market value? The answer seems to be yes. \u201cWhen you foster ongoing communications internally, you will have more satisfied employees who will be better equipped to effectively communicate with your customers,\u201d says Susan Meisinger, president and CEO of the Society for Human Resource Management. Research finds that organizations that are able to improve their communication integrity also increase their market value by as much as 7% (Meisinger, 2003). We will explore the definition and benefits of effective communication in our next section.<\/p>\n

        \n

        The Communication Process<\/h2>\n

        Communication fulfills three main functions within an organization, including coordination, transmission of information, and sharing emotions and feelings. All these functions are vital to a successful organization. The coordination of effort within an organization helps people work toward the same goals. Transmitting information is a vital part of this process. Sharing emotions and feelings bonds teams and unites people in times of celebration and crisis. Effective communication helps people grasp issues, build rapport with coworkers, and achieve consensus. So, how can we communicate effectively? The first step is to understand the communication process.<\/p>\n

        \n
        \n

        Figure 8.2<\/span><\/p>\n

        \"Lee<\/a><\/p>\n

        Lee Iacocca, past president and CEO of Chrysler until his retirement in 1992, said, \u201cYou can have brilliant ideas, but if you can\u2019t get them across, your ideas won\u2019t get you anywhere.\u201d<\/p>\n

        \n

        Wikimedia Commons<\/a> – public domain.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

        We all exchange information with others countless times each day by phone, e-mail, printed word, and of course, in person. Let us take a moment to see how a typical communication works using this as a guide.<\/p>\n

        \n
        \n

        Figure 8.3<\/span>\u00a0Process Model of Communication<\/p>\n

        \"Process<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

        A sender<\/a><\/span>, such as a boss, coworker, or customer, originates the message with a thought. For example, the boss\u2019s thought could be: \u201cGet more printer toner cartridges!<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

        The sender encodes<\/a><\/span> the message, translating the idea into words.<\/p>\n

        The boss may communicate this thought by saying, \u201cHey you guys, let\u2019s order more printer toner cartridges<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

        The medium<\/a><\/span> of this encoded message may be spoken words, written words, or signs.<\/p>\n

        The receiver<\/a><\/span> is the person who receives the message.<\/p>\n

        The receiver decodes<\/a><\/span> the message by assigning meaning to the words.<\/p>\n

        In this example, our receiver, Bill, has a to-do list a mile long. \u201cThe boss must know how much work I already have<\/em>,\u201d the receiver thinks. Bill\u2019s mind translates his boss\u2019s message as, \u201cCould you order some printer toner cartridges, in addition to everything else I asked you to do this week\u2026if you can find the time<\/em>?\u201d<\/p>\n

        The meaning that the receiver assigns may not be the meaning that the sender intended, because of factors such as noise. Noise<\/a><\/span> is anything that interferes with or distorts the message being transformed. Noise can be external in the environment (such as distractions) or it can be within the receiver. For example, the receiver may be extremely nervous and unable to pay attention to the message. Noise can even occur within the sender: The sender may be unwilling to take the time to convey an accurate message, or the words that are chosen can be ambiguous and prone to misinterpretation.<\/p>\n

        Picture the next scene. The place: a staff meeting. The time: a few days later. Bill\u2019s boss believes the message about printer toner has been received.<\/p>\n

        \u201cAre the printer toner cartridges here yet<\/em>?\u201d Bill\u2019s boss asks.<\/p>\n

        \u201cYou never said it was a rush job!<\/em>\u201d Bill protests.<\/p>\n

        \u201cBut!<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

        \u201cBut!<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

        Miscommunications like these happen in the workplace every day. We\u2019ve seen that miscommunication does occur in the workplace, but how does a miscommunication happen? It helps to think of the communication process. The series of arrows pointing the way from the sender to the receiver and back again can, and often do, fall short of their target.<\/p>\n

        \n

        Key Takeaway<\/h3>\n

        Communication is vital to organizations. Poor communication is prevalent between senders and receivers. Communication fulfills three functions within organizations, including coordination, the transmission of information, and sharing emotions and feelings. Noise can disrupt or distort communication.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

        \n

        Exercises<\/h3>\n
          \n
        1. Where have you seen the communication process break down at work? At school? At home?<\/li>\n
        2. Explain how miscommunication might be related to an accident at work.<\/li>\n
        3. Give an example of noise during the communication process.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

          References<\/h2>\n

          Alsop, R. (2006, September 20). The top business schools: Recruiters\u2019 M.B.A. picks. Wall Street Journal Online<\/em>. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB115860376846766495.html?mod=2_1245_1<\/a>.<\/p>\n

          Armour, S. (1998, September 30). Failure to communicate costly for companies. USA Today<\/em>, p. 1A.<\/p>\n

          Meisinger, S. (2003, February). Enhancing communications\u2014Ours and yours. HR Magazine<\/em>. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http:\/\/www.shrm.org\/hrmagazine\/archive\/0203toc.asp<\/a>.<\/p>\n

          Penley, L. E., Alexander, E. R., Jernigan, I. E., & Henwood, C. I. (1991). Communication abilities of managers: The relationship of performance. Journal of Management<\/em>, 17<\/em>, 57\u201376.<\/p>\n

          Schnake, M. E., Dumler, M. P., Cochran, D. S., & Barnett, T. R. (1990). Effects of differences in subordinate perceptions of superiors\u2019 communication practices. Journal of Business Communication<\/em>, 27<\/em>, 37\u201350.<\/p>\n

          1. NASA study cited by Baron, R. (n.d.). Barriers to effective communication: Implications for the cockpit. Retrieved July 3, 2008, from AirlineSafety.com: http:\/\/www.airlinesafety.com\/editorials\/BarriersToCommunication.htm<\/a>. ↵<\/a><\/li>
          2. Communications skills cut malpractice risk\u2014study reveals most important reason that patients decide to file malpractice suits is because of poor communication by physicians and not medical errors. (1997, October). USA Today<\/em>. ↵<\/a><\/li>
          3. What are the bottom line results of communicating? (2003, June). Pay for Performance Report<\/em>. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http:\/\/www.mercerHR.com<\/a>. ↵<\/a><\/li><\/ol><\/div>","protected":false},"author":255,"menu_order":1,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-169","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":151,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/255"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":468,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/169\/revisions\/468"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/151"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/169\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=169"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=169"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/obcourseweir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}