{"id":50,"date":"2025-10-31T15:32:59","date_gmt":"2025-10-31T19:32:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/openscholarship\/chapter\/predatory-publishing\/"},"modified":"2026-02-10T16:11:32","modified_gmt":"2026-02-10T21:11:32","slug":"predatory-publishing","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/openscholarship\/chapter\/predatory-publishing\/","title":{"raw":"Predatory Publishing","rendered":"Predatory Publishing"},"content":{"raw":"[pb_glossary id=\"274\"]Predatory publishing[\/pb_glossary] is the name given to a parasitic form of open access (OA) publishing that asks authors to pay the costs of publication often associated with OA, but doesn\u2019t adhere to the rigorous ethical standards expected by authors and readers. As a result of this strategy, predatory publishers are often accused of having high acceptance rates and not conducting thorough peer review. Predatory publishers typically have greater profit margins, as they accept a higher number of articles and collect more fees yet do not spend these fees on the publication process (peer review, copy editing, etc.).[footnote]Grudniewicz, A.,\u202fMoher, D.,\u202fCobey, K.\u202fD.,\u202fBryson, G.\u202fL.,\u202fCukier, S.,\u202fAllen, K.,\u202fArdern, C.,\u202fBalcom, L.,\u202fBarros, T.,\u202f et.al. (2019, December 11). Predatory journals: No definition, no defence. Nature,\u202f576, 210\u2011212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-03759-y<\/a>[\/footnote]\n

Who are the Prey?<\/h2>\nFor many active scholars, predatory publishing is nothing more than a nuisance, as easily ignored as the unsolicited emails they receive inviting them to submit a manuscript in a discipline far outside their area of expertise. Unfortunately not all scholars are able to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate publishers with graduate students and early-career scholars being particularly vulnerable to predatory publishers.\n\nThere is also evidence beginning to emerge which suggests that some scholars are knowingly publishing in predatory journals in response to mounting pressure to publish their research as quickly as possible. While traditional publication timelines can stretch into months or years, predatory publishers often advertise turnaround times of only a few weeks.[footnote]Kolata, G. (2017, October 30). Many academics are eager to publish in worthless journals. The New\u202fYork\u202fTimes. https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/10\/30\/science\/predatory-journals-academics.html<\/a>[\/footnote]\n

Nuisance or Threat?<\/h2>\nThere is growing concern that predatory publishing is having a cumulative negative effect on the value of and trust in academic research by the public, especially given that this potentially low-quality research is easily available to a public audience that still cannot access much of the \u201cgold standard\u201d research made available in the prestigious paywalled journals.\n\nWhile it is beneficial to make research available to a public audience, many in the general population are not able to easily distinguish between high-quality and low-quality research. They expect that the research they find online in scholarly journals can be trusted because it has been vetted by other experts in the field. This implicit trust in scientific research has built up over hundreds of years, but ultimately rests on assurances from publishers (the peer review process is rarely made available to readers). As a result, academic publishing is particularly vulnerable to bad faith actors.\n
\n\n\n\n
\n
Scenario \u2013 Quality control<\/h5>\nLet\u2019s consider this scenario: A graduate student you are supervising has recently completed an interdisciplinary research project and is looking to publish her research in an OA journal. Due to the nature of the project she is looking for publication venues outside those you typically recommend.\n
    \n \t
  • What guidance would you give this student to help them find a legitimate place to publish?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\"\"<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Signs of a Predatory Journal<\/h2>\nIdentifying predatory journals is an important skill set for authors and readers to hone. Think. Check. Submit.<\/a>, a cross-industry initiative to educate authors on how to identify potentially predatory journals provides useful resources to help guide decision-making.\n\nWatch the below video for a brief overview. Refer to the Gold OA section of the Pathways to Open<\/a> chapter to find information on selecting an appropriate OA journal.\n\n \n\n[embed]https:\/\/vimeo.com\/151882443?fl=pl&fe=vl[\/embed]\n

Think. Check. Submit<\/a>. (2016). Licensed under CC-BY.<\/sup><\/p>\n\n

Tarnishing the Reputation of Open Access<\/h2>\nPredatory publishing also does a disservice to the larger OA movement, as some scholars do not distinguish between high-quality OA journals and predatory ones. Additionally, there is concern among OA advocates that emerging and global south publishers are unfairly accused of being predatory and that this conflation stems from Global North bias in using things like English proficiency as a shortcut for assessing journal quality.\n\nThe distinction between predatory and not becomes even more muddied when we consider that some previously labeled predatory publishers respond to criticism and institute policies and workflows more consistent with other reputable publishers. At what point should these publishers be deemed legitimate, and who has the authority to decide? If we take alone the academic community\u2019s willingness to publish somewhere, then all publication channels are valid.[footnote]Petrou,\u202fC. (2020, August\u202f10). Guest Post \u2013 MDPI\u2019s Remarkable Growth. The Scholarly Kitchen. https:\/\/scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org\/2020\/08\/10\/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth\/<\/a>[\/footnote]\n
\n\n\n\n
\n
Dig Deeper<\/h5>\nTo learn more about the challenges of the term \u2018predatory\u2019 publishing, review:\n\nAnderson, R. (2015, May\u202f11). Should we retire the term \u201cpredatory publishing\u201d?<\/em>\u00a0 The Scholarly\u202fKitchen. https:\/\/scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org\/2015\/05\/11\/should-we-retire-the-term-predatory-publishing\/<\/a><\/td>\n
\"\"<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>","rendered":"

Predatory publishing<\/a> is the name given to a parasitic form of open access (OA) publishing that asks authors to pay the costs of publication often associated with OA, but doesn\u2019t adhere to the rigorous ethical standards expected by authors and readers. As a result of this strategy, predatory publishers are often accused of having high acceptance rates and not conducting thorough peer review. Predatory publishers typically have greater profit margins, as they accept a higher number of articles and collect more fees yet do not spend these fees on the publication process (peer review, copy editing, etc.).[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Who are the Prey?<\/h2>\n

For many active scholars, predatory publishing is nothing more than a nuisance, as easily ignored as the unsolicited emails they receive inviting them to submit a manuscript in a discipline far outside their area of expertise. Unfortunately not all scholars are able to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate publishers with graduate students and early-career scholars being particularly vulnerable to predatory publishers.<\/p>\n

There is also evidence beginning to emerge which suggests that some scholars are knowingly publishing in predatory journals in response to mounting pressure to publish their research as quickly as possible. While traditional publication timelines can stretch into months or years, predatory publishers often advertise turnaround times of only a few weeks.[2]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Nuisance or Threat?<\/h2>\n

There is growing concern that predatory publishing is having a cumulative negative effect on the value of and trust in academic research by the public, especially given that this potentially low-quality research is easily available to a public audience that still cannot access much of the \u201cgold standard\u201d research made available in the prestigious paywalled journals.<\/p>\n

While it is beneficial to make research available to a public audience, many in the general population are not able to easily distinguish between high-quality and low-quality research. They expect that the research they find online in scholarly journals can be trusted because it has been vetted by other experts in the field. This implicit trust in scientific research has built up over hundreds of years, but ultimately rests on assurances from publishers (the peer review process is rarely made available to readers). As a result, academic publishing is particularly vulnerable to bad faith actors.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n
\n
Scenario \u2013 Quality control<\/h5>\n

Let\u2019s consider this scenario: A graduate student you are supervising has recently completed an interdisciplinary research project and is looking to publish her research in an OA journal. Due to the nature of the project she is looking for publication venues outside those you typically recommend.<\/p>\n

    \n
  • What guidance would you give this student to help them find a legitimate place to publish?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\"\"<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Signs of a Predatory Journal<\/h2>\n

Identifying predatory journals is an important skill set for authors and readers to hone. Think. Check. Submit.<\/a>, a cross-industry initiative to educate authors on how to identify potentially predatory journals provides useful resources to help guide decision-making.<\/p>\n

Watch the below video for a brief overview. Refer to the Gold OA section of the Pathways to Open<\/a> chapter to find information on selecting an appropriate OA journal.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n