{"id":55,"date":"2017-12-29T04:19:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-29T04:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/chapter\/the-impact-of-diseases\/"},"modified":"2019-11-19T23:19:05","modified_gmt":"2019-11-19T23:19:05","slug":"the-impact-of-diseases","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/chapter\/the-impact-of-diseases\/","title":{"raw":"The Tools of Colonization","rendered":"The Tools of Colonization"},"content":{"raw":"In the rest of Section 2, we will look at the ways in which the Europeans colonized the country. The process of colonization and gaining control over the land, now called Canada, was a multifaceted action. We will consider four tools of colonization:\n<ul>\n \t<li>Treaties<\/li>\n \t<li>Laws and acts of Parliament<\/li>\n \t<li>The reserve system<\/li>\n \t<li>Residential schools<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nOne of the tools was the creation and signing of treaties, which the settlers viewed as a process that transferred title and control of First Nations\u2019 land to non-Indigenous people and governments. These treaties were obtained through unequal negotiations and the purpose, meaning, and long term significance of the signed treaties were understood differently by each signatory body. The British government, and then the Canadian government (after 1867), viewed the treaties as the completion of the transfer and control of land title to the \u201cCrown.\u201d\u00a0First Nations viewed themselves as equal partners (a Nation) when they signed the treaties, and as such they would still have access to their way of life and their traditional territories for their people, much like two governments working in parallel.\n<h2>Treaties: Who gains?<\/h2>\nIn theory, both parties to a treaty should gain something by signing, and each party also has obligations to the other. However, this was not the case for First Nations.\n\n[caption id=\"attachment_58\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"229\"]<a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/220\/2017\/12\/James-Bay-Treaty.jpg\"><img src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/ubcbatessandbox\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/863\/2017\/12\/James-Bay-Treaty-229x300.jpg\" alt=\"&quot;&quot;\" width=\"229\" height=\"300\" class=\"wp-image-54 size-medium\"><\/a> Fig 2.3: James Bay Treaty (Treaty 9)[\/caption]\n\nFirst Nations Peoples entered into these treaties in good faith. They saw them as an alternative to conflict and a way to forge a better relationship. Besides, no one can really \u201cown the land\u201d, so they assumed the land would still be available for their use.\n\nThe actual negotiations of the treaties were fraught with trickery, as many First Nations were not fully informed of the real content and meaning of the treaties. They were written in English, which they often could not read, and oral translations were not always accurate. First Nation leaders often had no real way of verifying what they were signing and assumed that the oral agreement surrounding the paper treaty was just as important. An oral agreement is honoured and is often witnessed by others present. These witnesses key task is to then remember and share what they heard in the agreement between parties.","rendered":"<p>In the rest of Section 2, we will look at the ways in which the Europeans colonized the country. The process of colonization and gaining control over the land, now called Canada, was a multifaceted action. We will consider four tools of colonization:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Treaties<\/li>\n<li>Laws and acts of Parliament<\/li>\n<li>The reserve system<\/li>\n<li>Residential schools<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>One of the tools was the creation and signing of treaties, which the settlers viewed as a process that transferred title and control of First Nations\u2019 land to non-Indigenous people and governments. These treaties were obtained through unequal negotiations and the purpose, meaning, and long term significance of the signed treaties were understood differently by each signatory body. The British government, and then the Canadian government (after 1867), viewed the treaties as the completion of the transfer and control of land title to the \u201cCrown.\u201d\u00a0First Nations viewed themselves as equal partners (a Nation) when they signed the treaties, and as such they would still have access to their way of life and their traditional territories for their people, much like two governments working in parallel.<\/p>\n<h2>Treaties: Who gains?<\/h2>\n<p>In theory, both parties to a treaty should gain something by signing, and each party also has obligations to the other. However, this was not the case for First Nations.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_58\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-58\" style=\"width: 229px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/220\/2017\/12\/James-Bay-Treaty.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/ubcbatessandbox\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/863\/2017\/12\/James-Bay-Treaty-229x300.jpg\" alt=\"&quot;&quot;\" width=\"229\" height=\"300\" class=\"wp-image-54 size-medium\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/863\/2017\/12\/James-Bay-Treaty-229x300.jpg 229w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/863\/2017\/12\/James-Bay-Treaty-65x85.jpg 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/863\/2017\/12\/James-Bay-Treaty-225x295.jpg 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/863\/2017\/12\/James-Bay-Treaty-350x459.jpg 350w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/863\/2017\/12\/James-Bay-Treaty.jpg 686w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 229px) 100vw, 229px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-58\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Fig 2.3: James Bay Treaty (Treaty 9)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>First Nations Peoples entered into these treaties in good faith. They saw them as an alternative to conflict and a way to forge a better relationship. Besides, no one can really \u201cown the land\u201d, so they assumed the land would still be available for their use.<\/p>\n<p>The actual negotiations of the treaties were fraught with trickery, as many First Nations were not fully informed of the real content and meaning of the treaties. They were written in English, which they often could not read, and oral translations were not always accurate. First Nation leaders often had no real way of verifying what they were signing and assumed that the oral agreement surrounding the paper treaty was just as important. An oral agreement is honoured and is often witnessed by others present. These witnesses key task is to then remember and share what they heard in the agreement between parties.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":211,"menu_order":3,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-55","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":48,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/55","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/211"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/55\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/55\/revisions\/56"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/48"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/55\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=55"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=55"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/opentestfoundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=55"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}