{"id":70,"date":"2017-06-08T04:18:15","date_gmt":"2017-06-08T08:18:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/chapter\/4-6-persuasive-appeals\/"},"modified":"2020-11-09T15:37:24","modified_gmt":"2020-11-09T20:37:24","slug":"5-6-persuasive-appeals","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/chapter\/5-6-persuasive-appeals\/","title":{"raw":"5.6 Persuasive appeals","rendered":"5.6 Persuasive appeals"},"content":{"raw":"Once you know who your intended audience is and what your purpose is for writing, you can make specific decisions about how to shape your message. No matter what, you want your audience to stick around long enough to read your whole piece. How do you manage this magic trick? Easy. You appeal to them. You get to know what sparks their interest, what makes them curious, and what makes them feel understood. The one and only Aristotle provided us with three ways to appeal to an audience, and they're called <em>logos, pathos, <\/em>and\u00a0<em>ethos<\/em>. You'll learn more about each appeal in the discussion below, but the relationship between these three appeals is also often called\u00a0<em>the rhetorical triangle <\/em>as shown in Figure 4.6.1.\r\n<div style=\"text-align: center\"><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-69 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/mashmantest\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/486\/2018\/05\/rhetorical_triangle_diagram.png\" alt=\"Ethos, which is ethics and credibility; pathos, which is emotion; and logos, which is logic and reason, are the three points in the rhetorical triangle.\" width=\"749\" height=\"421\" \/><\/div>\r\n<div>Figure 4.6.1. The rhetorical triangle<\/div>\r\n<h2>Pathos<\/h2>\r\nLatin for emotion, <em>pathos<\/em> is the fastest way to get your audience\u2019s attention. People tend to have emotional responses before their brains kick in and tell them to knock it off. Be careful though. Too much <em>pathos<\/em> can make your audience feel emotionally manipulated or angry because they\u2019re also looking for the facts to support whatever emotional claims you might be making so they know they can trust you.\r\n<h2>Logos<\/h2>\r\nLatin for logic, <em>logos<\/em> is where those facts come in. Your audience will question the validity of your claims; the opinions you share in your writing need to be supported using science, statistics, expert perspective, and other types of logic. However, if you only rely on <em>logos<\/em>, your writing might become dry and boring, so even this should be balanced with other appeals.\r\n<h2>Ethos<\/h2>\r\nLatin for ethics, <em>ethos<\/em> is what you do to prove to your audience that you can be trusted, that you are a credible source of information. (See <em>logos<\/em>.) It\u2019s also what you do to assure them that they are good people who want to do the right thing. This is especially important when writing an argument to an audience who disagrees with you. It\u2019s much easier to encourage a disagreeable audience to listen to your point of view if you have convinced them that you respect their opinion and that you have established credibility through the use of <em>logos<\/em> and <em>pathos<\/em>, which show that you know the topic on an intellectual and personal level.\r\n<h2>Fallacies<\/h2>\r\nRegardless of what appeals you use in your writing, it is important to be aware of fallacies (errors in reasoning) because they can reduce the impact of your message on your reader. For more information on common fallacies, refer to these resources available from the Writing Commons:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Logical fallacies: <a href=\"https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/section\/rhetoric\/rhetorical-reasoning\/rhetorical-appeals\/logos\/logical-fallacies\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/section\/rhetoric\/rhetorical-reasoning\/rhetorical-appeals\/logos\/logical-fallacies\/<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>Emotional fallacies: <a href=\"https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/article\/fallacious-pathos\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/article\/fallacious-pathos\/<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li>Ethical\/credible fallacies: <a href=\"https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/article\/fallacious-ethos\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/article\/fallacious-ethos\/<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2>Attribution<\/h2>\r\nThis chapter contains material taken from <a href=\"https:\/\/openoregon.pressbooks.pub\/wrd\/chapter\/appealing-to-your-audience\/\">\"Appealing to your audience\"<\/a> in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/openoregon.pressbooks.pub\/wrd\/chapter\/giving-and-receiving-feedback\/\">The Word on College Reading and Writing<\/a>\u00a0by M. Babin, C. Burnell, S. Pesznecker, N. Rosevear, and J. Wood\u00a0and is used under a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC-BY-NC 4.0 International<\/a>\u00a0license.","rendered":"<p>Once you know who your intended audience is and what your purpose is for writing, you can make specific decisions about how to shape your message. No matter what, you want your audience to stick around long enough to read your whole piece. How do you manage this magic trick? Easy. You appeal to them. You get to know what sparks their interest, what makes them curious, and what makes them feel understood. The one and only Aristotle provided us with three ways to appeal to an audience, and they&#8217;re called <em>logos, pathos, <\/em>and\u00a0<em>ethos<\/em>. You&#8217;ll learn more about each appeal in the discussion below, but the relationship between these three appeals is also often called\u00a0<em>the rhetorical triangle <\/em>as shown in Figure 4.6.1.<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-69 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/mashmantest\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/486\/2018\/05\/rhetorical_triangle_diagram.png\" alt=\"Ethos, which is ethics and credibility; pathos, which is emotion; and logos, which is logic and reason, are the three points in the rhetorical triangle.\" width=\"749\" height=\"421\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/486\/2018\/05\/rhetorical_triangle_diagram.png 749w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/486\/2018\/05\/rhetorical_triangle_diagram-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/486\/2018\/05\/rhetorical_triangle_diagram-65x37.png 65w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/486\/2018\/05\/rhetorical_triangle_diagram-225x126.png 225w, https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/486\/2018\/05\/rhetorical_triangle_diagram-350x197.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 749px) 100vw, 749px\" \/><\/div>\n<div>Figure 4.6.1. The rhetorical triangle<\/div>\n<h2>Pathos<\/h2>\n<p>Latin for emotion, <em>pathos<\/em> is the fastest way to get your audience\u2019s attention. People tend to have emotional responses before their brains kick in and tell them to knock it off. Be careful though. Too much <em>pathos<\/em> can make your audience feel emotionally manipulated or angry because they\u2019re also looking for the facts to support whatever emotional claims you might be making so they know they can trust you.<\/p>\n<h2>Logos<\/h2>\n<p>Latin for logic, <em>logos<\/em> is where those facts come in. Your audience will question the validity of your claims; the opinions you share in your writing need to be supported using science, statistics, expert perspective, and other types of logic. However, if you only rely on <em>logos<\/em>, your writing might become dry and boring, so even this should be balanced with other appeals.<\/p>\n<h2>Ethos<\/h2>\n<p>Latin for ethics, <em>ethos<\/em> is what you do to prove to your audience that you can be trusted, that you are a credible source of information. (See <em>logos<\/em>.) It\u2019s also what you do to assure them that they are good people who want to do the right thing. This is especially important when writing an argument to an audience who disagrees with you. It\u2019s much easier to encourage a disagreeable audience to listen to your point of view if you have convinced them that you respect their opinion and that you have established credibility through the use of <em>logos<\/em> and <em>pathos<\/em>, which show that you know the topic on an intellectual and personal level.<\/p>\n<h2>Fallacies<\/h2>\n<p>Regardless of what appeals you use in your writing, it is important to be aware of fallacies (errors in reasoning) because they can reduce the impact of your message on your reader. For more information on common fallacies, refer to these resources available from the Writing Commons:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Logical fallacies: <a href=\"https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/section\/rhetoric\/rhetorical-reasoning\/rhetorical-appeals\/logos\/logical-fallacies\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/section\/rhetoric\/rhetorical-reasoning\/rhetorical-appeals\/logos\/logical-fallacies\/<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Emotional fallacies: <a href=\"https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/article\/fallacious-pathos\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/article\/fallacious-pathos\/<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Ethical\/credible fallacies: <a href=\"https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/article\/fallacious-ethos\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/writingcommons.org\/article\/fallacious-ethos\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Attribution<\/h2>\n<p>This chapter contains material taken from <a href=\"https:\/\/openoregon.pressbooks.pub\/wrd\/chapter\/appealing-to-your-audience\/\">&#8220;Appealing to your audience&#8221;<\/a> in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/openoregon.pressbooks.pub\/wrd\/chapter\/giving-and-receiving-feedback\/\">The Word on College Reading and Writing<\/a>\u00a0by M. Babin, C. Burnell, S. Pesznecker, N. Rosevear, and J. Wood\u00a0and is used under a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/\">CC-BY-NC 4.0 International<\/a>\u00a0license.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":320,"menu_order":1,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-70","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":55,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/70","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/320"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/70\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":362,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/70\/revisions\/362"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/55"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/70\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=70"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=70"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/professionalcomms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=70"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}