- Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds) (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. New York: Routledge.
- Schön, D. A. (2017). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Routledge.
- Desoete, A., & De Craene, B. (2019). Metacognition and mathematics education: an overview. ZDM, 51(4), 565–575.
- Lew, M. D. N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Self-reflection and academic performance: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 529.
- O’Connell, T. S., & Dyment, J. E. (2016). ‘I’m just not that comfortable with technology’: student perceptions of and preferences for Web 2.0 technologies in reflective journals. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(3), 392–411.
- Rose, E. J., Sierschynski, J., Björling, E. A. (2016). Reflecting on Reflections: Using Video in Learning Reflection to Enhance Authenticity. The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 9.
- OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. Position paper. OECD.
- Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes – insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 127–157.
- Blomgren, C. (2017). Current Trends and Perspectives in the K-12 Canadian Blended and Online Classroom. In Ostashewski, N., Howell, J., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (Eds.), Optimizing K-12 Education through Online and Blended Learning(pp. 74-92). IGI Global.
- Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
- OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030. (2019). Anticipation-Action-Reflection Cycle for 2030. Concept Note. OECD.
- Dewey, J. (1909). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.
- Kalpana, T. (2014). A Constructivist Perspective on Teaching and Learning: A Conceptual Framework. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 27–29.
- Bonk, C. J. (2009). The World Is Open: How Web Technology Is Revolutionizing Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Skrypnyk, O., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G. (2015). The History and State of Blended Learning. In George Siemens, Dragan Gašević, & Shane Dawson (Eds.), Preparing for the digital university: a review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. (pp.52-92). Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
- van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Effects of self-regulated learning prompts in a flipped history classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106318.
- Deekens, V. M., Greene, J. A., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2018). Monitoring and depth of strategy use in computer-based learning environments for science and history. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 63–79.
- Van Laer, S., & Elen, J. (2017). In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1395–1454.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.
- Butler, D. (2015). Metacognition and self-regulation in learning. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Learning(pp. 291-309). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Winne, P. H. (2017). Cognition and Metacognition within Self-Regulated Learning. In Patricia A. Alexander, Dale H. Schunk, & Jeffrey A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. (pp. 36–48). New York: Routledge.
- Zimmerman, B. J. & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-Regulation: Where Metacognition and Motivation Intersect. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (259-277). New York: Routledge.
- Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: a meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187–202.
- Johnson, G., & Davies, S. (2014). Self-regulated learning in digital environments: theory, research, praxis. British Journal of Research, 1(2), 1–14.
- Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.
- Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 277–304). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Winne, P. H. & Nesbit, J. C. (2009). Supporting Self-Regulated Learning with Cognitive Tools. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (259-277). New York: Routledge.
- Van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2014). Metacognitive skills and intellectual ability of young adolescents: a longitudinal study from a developmental perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(1), 117–137.
- Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting Student Metacognition. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113–120.
- Cavilla, D. (2017). The Effects of Student Reflection on Academic Performance and Motivation. SAGE Open, 7.
- Van Velzen, J. H. (2017). Eleventh-Grade High School Students’ Accounts of Mathematical Metacognitive Knowledge: Explicitness and Systematicity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 319–333.
- Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., Norman, M. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Conijn, R., & Kester, L. (2020). Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 146, 103771.
- Verpoorten, D., & Westera, W. (2016). Structured reflection breaks embedded in an online course – effects on learning experience, time on task and performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 606–624.
- Villamizar, A. G., & Mejía, G. (2019). Fostering learner autonomy and critical reflection through digital video-journals in a university foreign language course. Reflective Practice, 20(2), 187–200.
- Reinholz, D. L. (2016). Developing mathematical practices through reflection cycles. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(3), 441–455.
- Sarwar, G. S., & Trumpower, D. L. (2015). Effects of conceptual, procedural, and declarative reflection on students’ structural knowledge in physics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 185–201.
- Hains-Wesson, R., & Young, K. (2017). A collaborative autoethnography study to inform the teaching of reflective practice in STEM. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 297–310.
- Lehmann, T., Hähnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323.
- McAlpine, L., & Weston, C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. Instructional Science, 28(5/6), 363–385.
- Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of Reflection Prompts When Learning with Hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 359–375.
- Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019). Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 11(1), 1–19.
- Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning Journals: A Handbook for Reflective Practice and Professional Development, 2ndEdition. New York: Routledge.
- Gregory, K., Cameron, C., and Davies, A. (2011).Self-Assessment and Goal Setting, 2nd Edition. Courtenay, BC: Connections Publishing.
- Kirk, C., & Pitches, J. (2013). Digital reflection: using digital technologies to enhance and embed creative processes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(2), 213–230.
- Parkes, K. A., & Kajder, S. (2010). Eliciting and Assessing Reflective Practice: A Case Study in Web 2.0 Technologies. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 218–228.
- Kajder, S., & Parkes, K. (2012). Examining Preservice Teachers’ Reflective Practice within and across Multimodal Writing Environments. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 229–249.
- Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511.
- Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
- Ostrow, K. S., & Heffernan, N. T. (2014). Testing the Multimedia Principle in the Real World: A Comparison of Video vs. Text Feedback in Authentic Middle School Math Assignments. EDM.
- Van der Kleij, F., Adie, L., & Cumming, J. (2017). Using video technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1092–1105.
- Clark, I. (2012). Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205–249.