{"id":1142,"date":"2022-04-14T13:35:31","date_gmt":"2022-04-14T17:35:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/?post_type=back-matter&p=1142"},"modified":"2022-05-02T14:38:24","modified_gmt":"2022-05-02T18:38:24","slug":"glossary-2","status":"publish","type":"back-matter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/back-matter\/glossary-2\/","title":{"raw":"Glossary","rendered":"Glossary"},"content":{"raw":"","rendered":"
\n
Theoretical Reviews<\/strong><\/em><\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

literature reviews that are organized around a theme, topic, trends or issue <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Academic writing<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A formal way of presenting evidence in a clear, concise, focused and structured manner according to the conventions of the discipline.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Affinity diagramming<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A technique to visually code data and establish relationships between them to discern themes and patterns.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Aims and scope<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

This will tell you what topics and concerns the journal is interested in. It will also provide information such as whether the journal is peer-reviewed, frequency of publications, types of readers (academic versus practice), speed of publication, and types of articles that are considered<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Argumentative Reviews<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

selective examinations of the literature with the goal of supporting or refuting an argument, deeply embedded assumption or a philosophical problem already established in the literature. <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

attributes<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

the descriptives (usually sample size, mean, distribution etc.) or characteristics (e.g. gender, age, class, ethnicity) of participants\/unit of observation<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Axial coding<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The process of finding relationships between codes and developing broader categories.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Bad data<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Data with defects such as information acquired through erroneous or sufficiently low-quality collection methods, study designs, or sampling techniques.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

boosters<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

words or statements that express your conviction about the validity of your statement(s)<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Call for abstracts<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A description of the themes at a conference and an invitation for your to indicate your interest in participating by submitting an abstract.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

CARS Model<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Create A Research Space or CARS is Swales' (1990) model for writing effective literature reviews involving determining the territory, establishing a niche and occupying the niche.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Chronological or Historical Reviews<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

undertakes a linear or progressive examination of the literature in the field over time.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

coding<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The process of organizing data into categories so that it can be analyzed<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

concept mapping<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A graphical representation of concepts and relationships between those concepts.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Concept Saturation<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

When sufficient studies discussing a concept are found in a literature search such that the research is unable to find new details, applications or meanings in relation to it. In other words, it is when a\u00a0 concept or paper becomes too prevalent in your literature review.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Concept Tracing<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Taking note of how often a paper or concept is mentioned in the literature review.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

consistency<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

the practice of ensuring that the context under which data is collected is similar across all cases in the study.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

constant comparative method<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

An aspect of grounded theory where a researcher sorts and organizes raw data into groups according to attributes to generate a new theory.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

content analysis<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A technique used to analyze the content and features of social artifacts often by identifying the presence of certain words, themes, or concepts.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Counting<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

In qualitative research, it is the process of enumerating or assigning numbers to data that is non-numerical<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Coverage Error<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Failure to include all components of the target population being studied, often arising from incomplete sampling frames.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Data analysis<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The process of evaluating data and synthesizing them into a coherent manner in response to research question(s).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Data collection<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The processes and procedures used to collect, measure and analyze data.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Debates<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Where two or more experts in the field who hold clearly differing points of view exchange insights on a topic. The interaction is usually moderated by a chairperson with a prepared set of questions.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

descriptive statistics<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Description or summary of the characteristics of a sample.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

discourse analysis<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A qualitative analysis technique used to understand the meanings of language taking context into account.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

discursive prose<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

prose which not only lists descriptions, but evaluates the evidence according to your research question<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Edited Volume<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A collection of scholarly or scientific works (chapters) written by different authors and compiled in a single source by an editor (e.g. a book).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Empirical studies<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

systematically observing social phenomena and or measuring constructs to demonstrate relationships among variables<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Expert lectures<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Formal presentations by an acknowledged expert in the field who will share conceptual or methodological innovations through a lecture followed by response to audience questions<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

field notes<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A record of the measurements, reflections, concerns, and other observations made by a researcher.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

framework analysis<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Uses preconceived categories, grids or matrices to determine patterns from the data.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Frequency distributions<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Representations, either in a graphical or tabular format, that displays the number of observations. <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Gaps<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The ambiguities, faults, and missing aspects of the established literature.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Generalize<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The ability to make inferences (broad statements) about the population from which the sample is drawn.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

genre<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

the agreed upon forms (the how\u2019s) that a community believes best achieves their goals<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Goal<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

What one hopes to achieve by answering the research question.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

grounded theory<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A method of generating hypotheses and theories through the process of collecting and analyzing data.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Growth Mindset<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Thinking of one\u2019s work as \u201cin progress\u201d, continually being improved rather than complete.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Hedging<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

refers to the boundary (hedges) we place around our argument (what it can and cannot speak for)<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

imposter syndrome<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

An extreme form of self-doubt, one in which you feel a constant sense of paranoia that you will be found out, that at any moment the act will be up<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

inferential statistics<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Statistical procedures that allow researchers to draw inferences from the data, i.e., make predictions or deductions about the population from which the sample is drawn.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

instruments<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The tools used to obtain data (e.g., questionnaires, interviews etc.).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

internal consistency<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

In data analysis refers to how reliable one\u2019s coding scheme is and whether it actually measures the constructs as intended.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

interpretive research<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

a paradigm that sees social reality as not singular or objective, but is rather shaped by human experiences and social contexts (ontology), and is therefore best studied within its socio-historic context by reconciling the subjective interpretations of its various participants (epistemology) \u2013see Bhattacherjee (2012).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Intersubjective<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Relates to how one\u2019s subjective interests link to others.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Keynote<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A talk that establishes a main underlying theme usually delivered by an expert.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Literature Review<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

An analytical summary of previous work on a topic. It describes, summarizes, clarifies and evaluates existing works as a means of understanding what is done or omitted in the field.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Macro schedule<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Identifying and making plans to address goals that address milestone components in a project, usually over a relatively longer time horizon (e.g. monthly).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Matrix tables<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A table which organizes your quotations under broad themes (in the columns) and cases (in the rows) to allow for easy comparison.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Measurement errors<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

When the response provided differs from the real value; such errors may be attributable to the respondent, the interviewer, the questionnaire, the collection method or the respondent's record-keeping system (OECD, 2013).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

memoing<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

the process of documenting ideas about concepts and their theoretically coded relationships as they evolve during the research process.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Methodological Reviews<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

focus primarily on the different ways that a phenomenon have been studied<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Micro schedule<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Identifying and making plans to address goals that address small tasks in a project, usually over a relatively shorter time horizon (e.g. weekly or daily).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Non-response errors<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Occurs when a researcher fails to get a response to at least one of the questions on an instrument.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Novelty<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Questions about whether the paper advancing new knowledge or an original contribution to the field<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Objectives<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A further elaboration on goals i.e., details about the steps that will be taken to achieve the goal.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Open access<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The practice of distributing research outputs and other scholarships online, free of access charges or other barriers.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Open coding<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The first stage in grounded theory where bits of information are assigned labels purely based on the data being analyzed<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Operationalization<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The process of defining how one is going to measure a phenomenon that is not directly measurable.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Oral presentation<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Where one or more speakers (joint-presenters) share research results, completed works, innovative concepts, theoretical application, methodologies or tools.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

outlining<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

the practice of sketching out the main points and sub-points (or arguments) and the supporting evidence that will be provided.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Panel presentation<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Where multiple speakers present their perspectives, ideas or research on a common theme or issue.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Pearson's correlation coefficient or Pearson\u2019s r<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A measure of the linear relationship between variables (commonly used in regressions).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Peer-review<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Evaluation of scientific, academic work by others working in the same field<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Positionality<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The way that one\u2019s position in the social hierarchy potentially shapes his\/her\/their identity and mediates access to power, opportunities and understandings of others.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

positionality statements<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

is a description of an author\u2019s identity, social location, experiences, influences, and philosophy concerning an issue.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Poster presentation<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A visual representation of your research through text, charts, graphs, and other visual aids on a poster.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

predatory journals<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Exploitative academic publishing business models that involve charging fees to authors while failing to perform rigorous review to uphold quality and integrity of scholarship.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Primary research<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Research that collects and derives its own raw data by sampling participants or cases, such as selecting and interviewing respondents. <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

procedure<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The activities that a researcher takes to collect data.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

quality data<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The data that are fit for their intended purpose, and have a close relationship with the construct they are intended to measure.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Rationale<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A statement outlining the reason that the researcher is conducting the study and a justification of the significance of the study.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

recall bias<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

the bias that results when answers to certain questions are hard to recall<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

recruitment process<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

how you advertised the study, whether a stipend or incentive was offered, and how students finally agreed to join in the study<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Reflexivity<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

One\u2019s ability to recognize, examine, react, and articulate his\/her\/their emotions, motives, and situation and articulate how external power relations influence research.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Relational accountability<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The sense of accountability that a researcher has to participants and their communities.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Repeatable<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The notion that another researcher should be able to repeat your methods and find the same results (see replicable).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Replicable<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Refers to the ability to repeat a study\u2019s method and produce the same results (see repeatable).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Research Ethics Board<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A committee of experts who applies research ethics to prospective research by reviewing the ethics applications and methods to ensure that they meet ethical standards.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

research paradigm<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The common beliefs, preferences, and assumptions shared amongst a group of researchers<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Sampling error<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A statistical error arising from the failure to select a sample that fully represents the population. It is inevitable each time a sample is drawn.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

sampling frame<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A list of the items or people forming a population from which a sample is taken.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

scope<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The extent to which a phenomena will be studied and the parameters within which the study is being conducted.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Secondary research<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Uses data from other primary research projects, such as a systematic literature review of other research. <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Selective coding<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The identification of core categories that captures the essence of the data and relating them to the rest of the data, i.e., developing overarching categories.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Self-care<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Acts of attending to one\u2019s physical, emotional, mental and other needs.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Self-indulgence<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Excessive or unrestrained gratification of one's own appetites, desires, or whims.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Self-neglect<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Extreme lack of attention to one\u2019s mental, emotional and physical needs.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

signal words<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

words used to convey transitions between different ideas in your paper e.g., \u2018however\u2019, \u2018furthermore\u2019 etc.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

SMART-ER Goals<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Goal setting technique to ensure that your plans are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound, engaging and rewarding (see MacLeod, 2012).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

social artifacts<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

things created by humans e.g., books, graffiti, advertisements, photographs, blogs etc.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

social desirability bias<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

the tendency not to disclose \u201canti-social\u201d information about oneself and others \u2013is common in primary data collection. Similarly, recall bias \u2013the bias that results when answers to certain questions are hard to recall <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Social problems<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The conditions, events, behaviors, or actions that either disrupt society or negatively impact many people.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Sociograms<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Tools for charting the relationships and visually representing the social links and preferences of individuals.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

sociological imagination<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The practice of locating individuals' private troubles and their intersection with the social structural, political and historical context that shapes their experiences.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Spearman\u2019s rho or Spearman's \u03c1<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A nonparametric measure of the relationship between variables, and is useful when variables are measured on scales that are at least ordinal.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

substance<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

When the data obtained is able to address the research question in an unbiased manner.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

survey research<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A research method involving sample data collected via questionnaires or interviews in a systematic manner.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Systematic Review<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

provide an overview of existing evidence (findings) as they relate to the research question of interest, drawing on previously published empirical observations, noting their methods, findings and analyses.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Systematic reviews<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Provides an overview of existing evidence (findings) as they relate to the research question of interest, drawing on previously published empirical observations, noting their methods, findings and analyses.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Template coding<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Refers to the coding of data using predetermined categories i.e., based on a template.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Theoretical research<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Uses other papers and articles, sometimes even other data (like secondary research), but with the purpose of advancing a new argument in the field.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Theoretical sampling<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

A process of data collection where the researcher simultaneously collects, codes and analyses data, which informs decisions about the next steps in data collection. The aim is to generate theory from the process.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Theoretical saturation<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Refers to when additional data fails to yield any significant change in the core categories or the relationships (see Bhattacherjee, 2012).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Theoretical studies<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Entails testing, exploring or developing arguments or theories based on observations or the compilation of information.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Theoretical theses<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

focused on the selection of social artifacts, ideas, theories and other secondary data to make an argument or to critique, expand, evaluate, compare or make applications of a theory(ies).<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Thick descriptions<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

Details of the contexts of behaviors and actions as interpreted by actors so that outsiders can have a better understanding of them.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

Time Management<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

The process of determining needs, setting goals to achieve these needs, and prioritizing and planning tasks required to achieve these goals<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n

verbatim transcripts<\/dfn><\/dt>\n
\n

word-for-word reproduction of verbal data, where the written words are an exact replication of the audio recorded words.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n","protected":false},"author":1076,"menu_order":1,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"back-matter-type":[38],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-1142","back-matter","type-back-matter","status-publish","hentry","back-matter-type-glossary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/back-matter\/1142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/back-matter"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/back-matter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1076"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/back-matter\/1142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1489,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/back-matter\/1142\/revisions\/1489"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/back-matter\/1142\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"back-matter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/back-matter-type?post=1142"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=1142"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.bccampus.ca\/undergradresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=1142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}