Chapter 6: Finding Credible Sources
Types of Scholarly Communication
Primary literature
How can I use this?
Primary sources are some of the most important documents in scientific research, and often they’re expected to form the bulk of the sources you incorporate into your research paper. Primary sources provide authoritative, first-hand research information, they are important to use in your work. You can use primary sources to provide credible evidence for your arguments and to back up specific claims.
What is it?
In science, sources that report on original research are known as Primary literature. They include:
- Conference Proceedings: It’s common for scientists to present their findings at a conference. These presentations are often written up and published in conference proceedings.
- Journal articles: Journals somewhat resemble magazines in appearance but they report on the findings of scholarly studies. Well-respected journals include articles that are evaluated by other researchers in the field (i.e. peer-reviewed or refereed). Journals can be published in print (i.e. hard copy) or on the web (also known as electronic journals or ejournals).
Example
Insulin: Publishing the Results
Conference proceedings: Banting presented their preliminary results at the American Physiological Society conference at Yale University in December 1921. In May 1922, the success of their clinical testing was presented at the conference for the Association for American Physicians.
Journal articles: During this time, Banting and Best also wrote up their findings and submitted two papers to the Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine.
Secondary literature
How can I use this?
Secondary sources are useful for both gaining a broad knowledge of a topic area (e.g., review papers), and for understanding how certain discoveries or projects were received by the scholarly community. They give you opinions, analysis, and a discussion of impact which you can use to place primary sources in context. They are useful to understand the various broad aspects of your research topic.
What is it?
When other writers summarize or review the theories and results of original scientific research, their publications are known as Secondary Literature. These publication types serve to synthesize the findings to date and present the ideas to a wider audience. Examples of secondary literature include:
- Review articles
- Edited volumes
- Books summarizing research in an area
- Abstracts and Indexes – Tools used to find articles in scholarly journals
Secondary literature is not as current as the primary literature but it is often more descriptive and is useful for finding introductory material.
Example
Insulin: Discussing the experiment and finding papers
Journal Article:
Grodsky (1970) wrote a journal article called Insulin and the pancreas[1] in which he reviewed over 500 other publications about insulin.
Article Index:
Researchers typically use online indexes to find articles on a specific topic. If you searched in Web of Science and looked up the author “Banting, F”, you would find citations to the articles he published in the Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. The “Finding Articles” module explains how to select and use an index.
[1] Grodsky, G.M. (1970). Insulin and the pancreas. Vitamins & Hormones, 28: 37-101.
Tertiary Literature
How can I use this?
Tertiary sources are helpful to understand when you’re beginning research on a topic to which you have no prior exposure. You can refer to tertiary sources when you need definitions or basic information about a topic.
What is it?
Tertiary sources index, abstract, organize, compile, or digest other sources. Examples of tertiary literature include:
- Dictionaries and encyclopedias
- Handbooks and guidebooks
The video Sources, created by UBC Science Writing, explains why it matters which of these sources are used in academic writing.
Example
Help! I don’t know anything about Insulin!
If I didn’t know anything about insulin, I might start looking in the online reference book the Concise Medical Dictionary.[1]
[1] Concise medical dictionary. (2010). Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY.
Try this mini-quiz:
Adaptations
Material in this section has been adapted from Sources by UBC Science Writing, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License and Library Research Skills for Land and Food Systems by Katherine Miller, Sally Taylor, Katherine Kalsbeek, Suzan Zagar, Megan Brown, Maggie Fabber, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources in Library Skills for 2nd Year Biology Students by Lauren Stieglitz, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Grodsky, G.M. (1970). Insulin and the pancreas. Vitamins & Hormones, 28: 37-101.
Martin, E. (2010). Concise medical dictionary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY.
Media Attributions
- communication © Made By Made Premium is licensed under a CC BY (Attribution) license
Something that is trustworthy and reliable.
A record of what happened or what was discussed during a conference.
An author reiterates the main ideas, arguments, and details of a text in their own words, condensing a longer text into a smaller version. Contrast with paraphrase.
A well-developed, concise summary of a scholarly research paper. It is not an excerpted passage from the paper, but a piece of original work. An abstract must be able to stand alone and make sense by itself.
Sources that index, abstract, organize, compile, or digest other sources. For example: Wikipedia.
To combine content from various different sources into one larger body or list.