Field Research: A Qualitative Research Technique
72 Summary
This chapter focused on a qualitative research method known as field research. It involves participant observation, interviewing, and document or artifact analysis. Field research can gather very detailed data; however, as such, field researchers often sacrifice breadth for depth as it relates to their findings.
Key Takeaways
- Ethnography or participant observation is a method of data collection; the former is most commonly used in anthropology, while the latter is used commonly in sociology.
- Field research typically involves a combination of participant observation, interviewing, and document or artifact analysis. It is a method used in qualitative research.
- The level to which a researcher undertakes participant observation lies on a continuum from complete observer to complete participant; however, most examples lie near the middle of the continuum.
- Strengths of field research include the fact that it yields very detailed data: it can uncover social facts that are not immediately obvious.
- Weaknesses of the field research are that researchers may have to sacrifice breadth for depth, the possibility that the research will be emotionally taxing, and the fact that documenting observations can be challenging.
- The ascribed aspects of our infield locations are those that are involuntary, such as our age or race or mobility. The achieved aspects of our infield locations, on the other hand, are those that we have some choice about.
- Overt researchers enter the field with the research participants awareness of the fact that they are thee subjects of social scientific research. Covert researchers, on the other hand, enter the field as though they are fill participants, opting no to reveal that they are also researchers or that the group they have joined is being studied.
- Descriptive field notes are notes that simply describe a field researcher’s observation as straightforwardly as possible. These notes typically do not contain explanations of or comments about those observations
- In the field research observation is deliberate, not haphazard.
- Handwritten notes must be typed up immediately upon leaving the field so that researchers can “fill the blanks” in their brief notes taken while in the field.
- Analytic field notes are notes that include the researcher’s impressions about his observation.
- Grounded theory involves generating theory from the ground up. In analyzing their data, many field researchers conduct grounded theory.
References
Birch, P., Vickers, M. H., Kennedy, M., & Galovic, S. (2017). Wellbeing, occupational justice and police practice: an ‘affirming environment’? Police Practice & Research, 18(1), 26-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2016.1205985
Harrison, T. R., Yang, F., Anderson, D., Morgan, S. E., Muhamad, J. W., Solle, N.S., …Kobetz, E. (20017). Resilience, culture change, and cancer risk reduction in a fire rescue organization: Clean gear as the new badge of honor. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25, 171-181. 10.1111/1468-5973.12182
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home (1st ed.). New York, NY: Viking.
Humphreys, L. (1970). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. London, UK: Duckworth.
Li, J. (2008). Ethical challenges in participant observation: A reflection on ethnographic fieldwork. The Qualitative Report, 13(1),100-115. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss1/8
Lorenzo, R. A., & Lins, B. A. (2018). The act of listening to “battered” women: An ethnographic comparison of police and emergency responses in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Latin American Research Review, 53(1), 96-110. doi: https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.348
Palys, T., & Atchison, C. (2014). Research decisions: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Toronto, ON: Nelson Education Ltd.
Paretta, L. T., Catalano, A. (2013). What students really do in the library: An observational study. The Reference Library, 54(2), 157-167. doi:10.1080/02763877.2013.755033
Schmitz, A. (2012). Principles of sociological inquiry; Qualitative and quantitative methods. Washington, DC: Saylor Academy. Retrieved from https://www.saylor.org/site/textbooks/Principles%20of%20Sociological%20Inquiry.pdf
Shaffir, W., Marshall, V., & Haas, J. (1980). Competing commitments: Unanticipated problems of field research. Qualitative Sociology, 2(3), 56-71.
White, C. & Jha, S. (2018). Towards an interdisciplinary approach to wellbeing: Life histories and self-determination theory in Rural Zambia. Social Science & Medicine, 212, 153-160. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.026
Wood, J. D., Watson, A. C., & Fulambarker, A. J. (2017). The “gray zone” of police work during mental health encounters; Findings from an observational study in Chicago. Police Quarterly, 20(1), 81-105. doi:10.1177/1098611116658875
