References

  1. Canada PHA. At-a-glance – Climate change impacts on health and wellbeing in rural and remote regions across Canada: a synthesis of the literature 2020. [cited 2021 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/ health-promotion-chronic-disease-prevention-canada-research-policy-practice/vol-39-no-4-2019/climate-change-impacts-health-wellbeing-rural-remote-regionsacross-canada-synthesis.html 
  2. Chemonics International Inc. Integrating social and behavior change in climate change adaptation: An introductory guide. USAID. 2019.
  3. Lee EY, Khan A. Prevalence and Clustering Patterns of Pro-Environmental Behaviors among Canadian Households in the Era of Climate Change. Sustainability. 2020(12):8218. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198218
  4. Crawford E, Barter S, Klein K. Framework for Collaborative Action on Health & Climate Change. SHIFT Collaborative. 2019.
  5. Gifford R, Kormos C, McIntyre A. Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. WIREs Clim Change. 2011; 2:801–27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.143
  6. Chwialkowska A, Bhatti WA, Glowik M. The influence of cultural values on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 268:122305. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122305
  7. Koletsou A, Mancy R. Which efficacy constructs for large-scale social dilemma problems? Individual and collective forms of efficacy and outcome expectancies in the context of climate change mitigation. Risk Management 2011; 13:184–208. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/rm.2011.12
  8. Bechtoldt MN, Götmann A, Moslener U, Pauw WP. Addressing the climate change adaptation puzzle: a psychological science perspective. Climate Policy. 2021; 21:186–202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1807897
  9. Heald S. Climate Silence, Moral Disengagement, and Self-Efficacy: How Albert Bandura’s Theories Inform Our Climate-Change Predicament. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2017;59:4–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2017.1374792
  10. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991; 50:179–211. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  11. Higueras-Castillo E, Liébana-Cabanillas FJ, Muñoz-Leiva F, Molinillo S. The role of collectivism in modeling the adoption of renewable energies: a cross-cultural approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2019; 16:2143–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02235-4.
  12. Higueras-Castillo E, Liébana-Cabanillas FJ, Muñoz-Leiva F, Molinillo S. The role of collectivism in modeling the adoption of renewable energies: a cross-cultural approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2019;16:2143–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02235-4
  13. Owen AL, Videras J. Civic cooperation, pro-environment attitudes, and behavioural intentions n.d. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.007
  14. Curtin L, Cohn TJ. Overview of rural communities: Context, challenges and resilience. American Psychological Association 2015 [cited 2021 Oct 12]. Available from:https://www.apa.org/pi/aids/resources/exchange/2015/01/rural-communities 
  15. Dangelico RM, Fraccascia L, Nastasi A. National culture’s influence on environmental performance of countries: A study of direct and indirect effects. Sustainable Development. 2020;28:1773–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2123
  16. González-Bravo MI, Lahuerta-Otero E. Can National Culture Affect the Implementation of Common Sustainable Policies? A European Response. CrossCultural Research. 2018;52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397117739849
  17. Hughes B, Wallin G. Sharing Information to Strengthen Rural Communities: Lessons Learned from BC Projects. n.d.:213.
  18. Aalhus PM, Fumerton DR. The social determinants of health impacts of resource extraction and development in rural and northern communities: A summary of impacts and promising practices for assessment and monitoring. 2018:84.
  19. Hales D, Hohenstein W, Bidwell MD, Landry C, McGranahan D, Molnar J, et al. Climate Change Impacts in the United States. US Global Change Research Program. 2014:17. Available from: https://doi.org/doi:10.7930/J01Z429C
  20. De Berenguer J, Corraliza J, Martín R. Rural-Urban Differences in Environmental Concern, Attitudes, and Actions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2005;21:128–38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.128
  21. Seymour V. The Human–Nature Relationship and Its Impact on Health: A Critical Review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2016;4:260. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00260
  22. Piggott-McKellar AE, McNamara KE, Nunn PD, Watson JEM. What are the barriers to successful community-based climate change adaptation? A review of grey literature. Local Environment. 2019;24:374–90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1580688
  23. Eisenack K, Moser SC, Hoffmann E, Klein RJT, Oberlack C, Pechan A, et al. Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nature Climate Change. 2014;4:867–72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2350
  24. Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L. Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change Among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications. Global Environmental Change. 2007;17:445–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
  25. Gifford RD, Chen AKS. Why aren’t we taking action? Psychological barriers to climate-positive food choices. Climatic Change. 2017;140:165–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1830-y
  26. Marlon JR, Bloodhart B, Ballew MT, Rolfe-Redding J, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A, et al. How Hope and Doubt Affect Climate Change Mobilization. Frontiers in Communication. 2019;4:20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00020
  27. Sparkman G, Howe L, Walton G. How social norms are often a barrier to addressing climate change but can be part of the solution. Behavioural Public Policy. 2021;5:528–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.42.
  28. Nyborg K, Anderies JM, Dannenberg A, Lindahl T, Schill C, Schlüter M, et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 2016;354:42–3. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8317
  29. Mortensen CR, Neel R, Cialdini RB, Jaeger CM, Jacobson RP, Ringel MM. Trending Norms: A Lever for Encouraging Behaviors Performed by the Minority. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2019;10:201–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617734615.
  30. Sparkman G, Walton GM. Dynamic Norms Promote Sustainable Behavior, Even if It Is Counternormative. Psychol Sci. 2017;28:1663–74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Building Resilient Rural Communities Copyright © 2023 by Centre for Rural Health Research and Rural Health Services Research Network of BC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book